Scan barcode
tani's review against another edition
4.0
Fast-paced and fun. Liked this one considerably more than the first book in the series.
tigerb99's review against another edition
3.0
Well, that's enough of that. This book was... slight. Especially for the price. I'm intrigued by the world but not by the plots. Sooo... I quit.
tulletempest's review against another edition
adventurous
dark
mysterious
fast-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.75
kiwikathleen's review against another edition
4.0
A great sequel to [b:Something from the Nightside|155421|Something from the Nightside (Nightside, #1)|Simon R. Green|http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1309202884s/155421.jpg|150023] - I enjoyed this thoroughly. And I really like Green's portrayal of angels - none of that saccharine image so beloved by the masses.
I love this (page 192):
"Typical angels," said Merlin . . . "All bluff and bluster. Bullies, then and now. The Hereafter's attack dogs, only with less manners."
I love this (page 192):
"Typical angels," said Merlin . . . "All bluff and bluster. Bullies, then and now. The Hereafter's attack dogs, only with less manners."
sassypants859's review against another edition
4.0
A quick fun read. I like the supernatural world that he's made. It's dark but also entertaining. Like an old-fashioned comic book or pulp adventure.
kenderwolf's review against another edition
4.0
Since I enjoyed the first, I figured I should continue on and see what this series had to offer. I didn't enjoy this one quite as much as the first, but it was still a decent romp. I was a little exasperated at how surprised the main character was to learn who Jude really is (I mean, COME ON), but aside from that I enjoyed it. I definitely liked the "angels as the army of god" stance; not quite the cherubs with harps treatment that is so over done. All in all, a creative enough second book that I'll read the third.
beefgir's review against another edition
1.0
this author is really bad at writing.
there are several problems i have with his style. but before all that, i have to talk about the god damn nightside.
i swear to fuck, stop talking about the nightside!
we get it. you are IN the nightside. you dont need to wax poetic every other sentence about it. he would start describing where he was, and then just start talking about the nightside:
you have to be that way to grow up in the nightside.
thats just how you live in the nightside.
who knows what will happen cause you are in the nightside.
the nightside this, the nightside that, the nightside, the nightside the nightside the nightside.
thats what put me off this book the most was just every other line was about how unusual and strange and scary the nightside is. but it was to a disgusting degree.
its like if someone was missing both arms, and they where telling stories, but they wanted you to feel bad for them all the time, so they constantly remind you though out the story how they cant pick up this cup like everyone else, or how they cant hold the railing, because "i got no arms"
for example "i stepped off the moving subway, and staggered slightly. it was hard to catch my balance because i had no arms. finally under control i walked over to the turn style, and jammed my hips into it, because i dont have hands to push it out of the way. it rotated as i passed. now that my hips where hurting, i looked for the stairs to leave the subway when someone approached me. they asked for some spare change, but i could not give any because i dont have hands to reach into my pockets. i hope he didnt notice, because if he attacked me, i could not fight him off because i have no hands. so i tried to point him to someone else who might help, but i cant point because like i said, i dont have arms. so i told him i could not help him. he thanked me anyway and offered me a hand to shake. i stared at it. a stab of pain shot though me because i could not shake his hand because i didnt have any hands. suddenly the man noticed his mistake and awkwardly walked away. sighing, i walked over to the stares to leave the tunnel. as i ascended, i stumbled and tried to grab the railing, but i dont have any hands, so i cracked my teeth on the steps as i fell. my world filled with pain as i slid back down the stares, unable to stop myself because i dont have any arms. a man saw me fall and rushed over. he offered me a hand up. i started crying, BECAUSE I DONT HAVE ANY HANDS!!!"
its like that, but about the nightside. its EXHAUSTING!
now about his other flaws.
#1
characters actions do not make sense most of the time. conversations do not flow. most of the conversations are just questions blurted out with no thought process or lead up, or any sign that such a question was coming.
"why did you shoot me 6 years ago. i didnt know why i said it, but i did" is a line that just pops up after asking someone if they are eating properly. after talking for 3 pages about the history they have together, and how he has access to her house, and the state it is in. its just sloppy writing. its like the author does not know how to have conversations, and hes just jamming dialog together as best he can.
or a time that he was bartering with some demons, and they say name a price. he says he wants information. then no lead up, or backstory, or anything, he just says "where is my mother" i didnt know she was missing, or that it was even in the story, but this important question is just thrown into the middle of a conversation like everyone saw it coming.
#2
first person story telling.
the story is told in first person, but he describes things he can obviously not see. like a dead girl they saw across the room, he gave great detail on how their where teeth marks on her exposed ribs from a hole in her side, and that he could tell that several organs where missing. which just is not possible.
the author just steps out of the first person theme to describe EVERYTHING going on around him, and its overwhelming most of the time, cause its the nightside, and he has to tell how incredibly strange it is, but he has the main character tell it all in inner dialog. which makes no sense!
#3
because of his inability to make events connect, you are just along for a ride with no purpose. no actions are explained, and there is no logical reason for going anywhere. you just have to fallow along.
i read the first book, and had the same problem. i hated it. years later i found out the series had kept going, so i thought i would give the second one a try, hoping he had gotten better. i was wrong. i do not recommend this series, or anything this person writes.
there are several problems i have with his style. but before all that, i have to talk about the god damn nightside.
i swear to fuck, stop talking about the nightside!
we get it. you are IN the nightside. you dont need to wax poetic every other sentence about it. he would start describing where he was, and then just start talking about the nightside:
you have to be that way to grow up in the nightside.
thats just how you live in the nightside.
who knows what will happen cause you are in the nightside.
the nightside this, the nightside that, the nightside, the nightside the nightside the nightside.
thats what put me off this book the most was just every other line was about how unusual and strange and scary the nightside is. but it was to a disgusting degree.
its like if someone was missing both arms, and they where telling stories, but they wanted you to feel bad for them all the time, so they constantly remind you though out the story how they cant pick up this cup like everyone else, or how they cant hold the railing, because "i got no arms"
for example "i stepped off the moving subway, and staggered slightly. it was hard to catch my balance because i had no arms. finally under control i walked over to the turn style, and jammed my hips into it, because i dont have hands to push it out of the way. it rotated as i passed. now that my hips where hurting, i looked for the stairs to leave the subway when someone approached me. they asked for some spare change, but i could not give any because i dont have hands to reach into my pockets. i hope he didnt notice, because if he attacked me, i could not fight him off because i have no hands. so i tried to point him to someone else who might help, but i cant point because like i said, i dont have arms. so i told him i could not help him. he thanked me anyway and offered me a hand to shake. i stared at it. a stab of pain shot though me because i could not shake his hand because i didnt have any hands. suddenly the man noticed his mistake and awkwardly walked away. sighing, i walked over to the stares to leave the tunnel. as i ascended, i stumbled and tried to grab the railing, but i dont have any hands, so i cracked my teeth on the steps as i fell. my world filled with pain as i slid back down the stares, unable to stop myself because i dont have any arms. a man saw me fall and rushed over. he offered me a hand up. i started crying, BECAUSE I DONT HAVE ANY HANDS!!!"
its like that, but about the nightside. its EXHAUSTING!
now about his other flaws.
#1
characters actions do not make sense most of the time. conversations do not flow. most of the conversations are just questions blurted out with no thought process or lead up, or any sign that such a question was coming.
"why did you shoot me 6 years ago. i didnt know why i said it, but i did" is a line that just pops up after asking someone if they are eating properly. after talking for 3 pages about the history they have together, and how he has access to her house, and the state it is in. its just sloppy writing. its like the author does not know how to have conversations, and hes just jamming dialog together as best he can.
or a time that he was bartering with some demons, and they say name a price. he says he wants information. then no lead up, or backstory, or anything, he just says "where is my mother" i didnt know she was missing, or that it was even in the story, but this important question is just thrown into the middle of a conversation like everyone saw it coming.
#2
first person story telling.
the story is told in first person, but he describes things he can obviously not see. like a dead girl they saw across the room, he gave great detail on how their where teeth marks on her exposed ribs from a hole in her side, and that he could tell that several organs where missing. which just is not possible.
the author just steps out of the first person theme to describe EVERYTHING going on around him, and its overwhelming most of the time, cause its the nightside, and he has to tell how incredibly strange it is, but he has the main character tell it all in inner dialog. which makes no sense!
#3
because of his inability to make events connect, you are just along for a ride with no purpose. no actions are explained, and there is no logical reason for going anywhere. you just have to fallow along.
i read the first book, and had the same problem. i hated it. years later i found out the series had kept going, so i thought i would give the second one a try, hoping he had gotten better. i was wrong. i do not recommend this series, or anything this person writes.
searmh's review against another edition
5.0
Fabulous
Read book 1 and 2 and loved every page, love the stories, the characters and the settings. Similar to the markhat files and the drake books, if you like paranormal detective books you have to read these. I will be hurrying along to book 3. Really very good stuff
Read book 1 and 2 and loved every page, love the stories, the characters and the settings. Similar to the markhat files and the drake books, if you like paranormal detective books you have to read these. I will be hurrying along to book 3. Really very good stuff