Take a photo of a barcode or cover
arliealizzi's review against another edition
funny
lighthearted
reflective
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.0
on my to read list ever since I first walked into the art world
So disappointing that the plot was just not as racy or as daring as I had hoped, parts of it are like a grad art essay with a sprinkling of plotline attached. The analysis is basic. I can see how it birthed a genre of 'theoretical fiction' and you like Miranda July, Maggie Nelson etc you will enjoy
So disappointing that the plot was just not as racy or as daring as I had hoped, parts of it are like a grad art essay with a sprinkling of plotline attached. The analysis is basic. I can see how it birthed a genre of 'theoretical fiction' and you like Miranda July, Maggie Nelson etc you will enjoy
hannahmaccas's review against another edition
challenging
funny
mysterious
reflective
medium-paced
3.75
caramonzon's review against another edition
adventurous
reflective
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
2.5
esnowmann's review against another edition
2.0
devoured the first half, but it lost me in the second; at this point i'm skeptical of any joey soloway source material
rikkestavski's review against another edition
2.0
Dette er en interessant bog, i form af at den er blevet så ikonisk, og alt udenomssnak omkring den er ret relevant, men det er bestemt ikke en bog for alle. Hvis man går til den med en forhåbning om en plotdrevet bog, så bliver man en anelse skuffet. Derimod er den ret journalistisk, filosoferende og tankevækkende på det akademiske plan, hvilket kan være til stor interesse for de helt rigtige personer - det var desværre bare ikke mig. Dog har den til tider nogle spændende feministiske betragtninger, så derfor var bogen også okay.
Selve brevformen var egentlig ret spændende til at starte med - Chris og Sylvère skiftes til at skrive breve til Dick, som de dog ikke sender, men blot viser til hinanden, mens de snakker om dem. Chris begærer Dick, og Sylvère bliver en anelse jaloux, hvilket var en god start. Dog begynder Chris at reflektere over sit fortidsjeg, mens hun gør sig en masse filosofiske tanker, som blev lidt langtrukket for mig, der gerne ville følge bogen for plottet - det var dog desværre ikke formålet med bogen.
"Jeg tror, at alene det, at kvinder taler, eksisterer, paradoksalt, uforklarligt, rapkæftet, selvdestruktivt, men frem for alt offentligt, er det mest revolutionerende i hele verden." - citat side 232.
Selve sproget er som nævnt tidligere på et ret akademisk plan, og jeg følte til tider, at det var en bog, jeg læste til studiet - hvilket den sikkert ville være spændende til! Men eftersom jeg ikke læste den med det formål, men blot for underholdningens skyld, så var skuffelsen stor, og bogen gjorde mig lidt irriteret. Jeg følte, at den forsøgte at hive sig selv op på et højere niveau, og det var desværre ikke lige dét, jeg var i humør til. Jeg havde faktisk forventet, at den ville være humoristisk på grund af titlen, så måske var jeg bare helt forkert på den fra starten af.
Selve brevformen var egentlig ret spændende til at starte med - Chris og Sylvère skiftes til at skrive breve til Dick, som de dog ikke sender, men blot viser til hinanden, mens de snakker om dem. Chris begærer Dick, og Sylvère bliver en anelse jaloux, hvilket var en god start. Dog begynder Chris at reflektere over sit fortidsjeg, mens hun gør sig en masse filosofiske tanker, som blev lidt langtrukket for mig, der gerne ville følge bogen for plottet - det var dog desværre ikke formålet med bogen.
"Jeg tror, at alene det, at kvinder taler, eksisterer, paradoksalt, uforklarligt, rapkæftet, selvdestruktivt, men frem for alt offentligt, er det mest revolutionerende i hele verden." - citat side 232.
Selve sproget er som nævnt tidligere på et ret akademisk plan, og jeg følte til tider, at det var en bog, jeg læste til studiet - hvilket den sikkert ville være spændende til! Men eftersom jeg ikke læste den med det formål, men blot for underholdningens skyld, så var skuffelsen stor, og bogen gjorde mig lidt irriteret. Jeg følte, at den forsøgte at hive sig selv op på et højere niveau, og det var desværre ikke lige dét, jeg var i humør til. Jeg havde faktisk forventet, at den ville være humoristisk på grund af titlen, så måske var jeg bare helt forkert på den fra starten af.
tarinisehgal's review against another edition
emotional
reflective
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.75
No one is doing having an unrequited crush like Chris Kraus. and I respect that. I have never personally thought I can justify every single romantic(?) decision I have ever made more.
What a reading experience, and segments of this book are truly circling through my mind constantly.
Long art descriptions that I don’t think I fully got aside, I loved the examination of desire, shame and the sheer insanity of it all that came with the entire book. Do I think it’s a good book? I don’t know, but I enjoyed it. Debated between a 3.75 and 4 stars.
What a reading experience, and segments of this book are truly circling through my mind constantly.
Long art descriptions that I don’t think I fully got aside, I loved the examination of desire, shame and the sheer insanity of it all that came with the entire book. Do I think it’s a good book? I don’t know, but I enjoyed it. Debated between a 3.75 and 4 stars.
the_midnight_librarhi's review against another edition
2.0
Well. What the actual heck was that.
The first 80 pages or so, as I was getting used to the book's style (which I'd soon discover was NOT a constant), disturbed me a lot.
I got used to the weirdness at some point, but when the author started subbing in their own name for someone else's (even though it was a fancy literary reference) I felt like I was losing it, which was maybe the point?!
I was worried I wouldn't finish the book, especially as I'd seen so many 1 star reviews on here, but I gave it a shot and made it to the end. Just uncomfortable to read. And not one for people who don't like artistic descriptions. I'm an art-loving feminist but yeah, wouldn't necessarily recommend. Unless you want total creepy randomness, in which case go ahead.
The first 80 pages or so, as I was getting used to the book's style (which I'd soon discover was NOT a constant), disturbed me a lot.
I got used to the weirdness at some point, but when the author started subbing in their own name for someone else's (even though it was a fancy literary reference) I felt like I was losing it, which was maybe the point?!
I was worried I wouldn't finish the book, especially as I'd seen so many 1 star reviews on here, but I gave it a shot and made it to the end. Just uncomfortable to read. And not one for people who don't like artistic descriptions. I'm an art-loving feminist but yeah, wouldn't necessarily recommend. Unless you want total creepy randomness, in which case go ahead.
zoellu's review against another edition
5.0
making this my whole personality now
so many thoughts and emotions rushing through me
this text will stay with me forever
so many thoughts and emotions rushing through me
this text will stay with me forever
molberto's review against another edition
emotional
funny
informative
reflective
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.5