Scan barcode
bisexualwentworth's reviews
753 reviews
Did not finish book. Stopped at 29%.
Did not finish book. Stopped at 0%.
Where Eldest's use of multiple points of view felt awkward at times because we stayed with the same character for SO LONG before switching again, in Brisingr it feels much more natural. We spend three or four chapters with Eragon and then a chapter or two with Roran or Nasuada or even, in one of my favorite chapters of the whole book, with Saphira as she goes about her routine in Eragon's absence.
The pacing is definitely strange. The first 45% of this book happens over the course of about a week, and then an unknown amount of time passes in the middle, after which things speed up again and the last section also occurs over the course of a week or so. There’s more action than in book two, but the overall plot doesn’t progress much with the exception of two big battles and two major reveals. I didn’t mind that, but I think a lot of other readers likely would.
Paolini cuts down somewhat on the excessive descriptions here, and there are a lot more moments where his passion for describing absolutely everything are put to good use with more intentional and economical writing than in the first two books (though Brisingr is definitely still overly long and wordy in many ways): the descriptions of all of the dwarf clan leaders, the forging scene at the end, the description of Blödhgarm, etc.
Speaking of Blödhgarm, what an absolutely wild character. I remembered that he was an elf furry but I somehow forgot that he is 1) blue and 2) described as smelling EXTREMELY sexy.
I love Arya in this book, and her and Eragon's dynamic is actually really compelling. In a vacuum, I would absolutely root for them based on their interactions here. Unfortunately, there is still about an 85-year age gap and also he HARASSED HER for most of the previous book.
Roran and Katrina are annoying. The human gender roles continue to be absolutely horrendous, and nowhere are the worse than in the framing of this relationship. Paolini has said that they are based on his parents, and maybe his parents have a good dynamic, but I don't like this fictionalized version. It's odd, because normally I'd be all for a man who loves his wife as much as Roran loves Katrina, but it comes with such a strong paternalistic vibe that I simply cannot bring myself to care. The wedding vows? Ick. Like yes they fit the world Paolini has created, but that's his own damn fault for creating it like that.
Elsewhere, however, women do actually feel like people in this book. Nasuada is an excellent leader who makes hard choices and whose gender and culture feel like actually important aspects of how she is without defining her. The random women who get their fortunes told by Angela also feel like real people who have lives beyond what we see and beyond the viewpoints of Eragon and other main characters. Same with the dwarf women we meet in this book, especially the clan leader of the War Wolves. And we learn a bit more about Eragon's mother, though she is still very much defined by her relationships with two specific men.
And there is finally an actually cute romantic relationship: Orik and his wife Hvedra. They are adorable people who admire and support each other. I love them.
I know that a lot of people don't like the dwarf politics section, but I love it. There are so many good moments. It develops aspects of the world we're already familiar with without getting too bogged down in exposition and while still moving the plot along. And the religion stuff is fascinating and continues the philosophical discussions introduced in Eldest and that are also present in Eragon and Arya's scenes as well as the Sloan stuff.
The disability politics are still awful but are much less present. And the ending is heartbreaking.
The Urgals have some weird cultural coding going on, but Eragon's racism finally gets questioned and unpacked, and in general both the Urgals and the Wandering Tribes are portrayed much more normally and sensitively than in the first two books.
Parts of the plot are still Star Wars, but the family stuff gets more complicated, and the themes of inheritance come into play much more seriously.
There are also some interesting explorations of codependency in Eragon and Saphira's relationship that I really appreciated.
I discovered during the reread that a lot of people don't like Brisingr, or at least remember not really vibing with it at kids. I think that could partly be because it's so much more mature. Eragon and Eldest are all vibes and action and worldbuilding, and Brisingr gets much more philosophical and intentional. The author is in his twenties now, and he's grappling with different ideas than he was as a teenager, and so the conversations here are much more interesting to young adult readers (like I am now) than to the tweens and teens who were the target audience for the first two books.
I am genuinely excited to get to my reread of Inheritance. I remember it being incredibly divisive when it came out, and I am interested to see what my thoughts are on it now, more than ten years after I first read it. I remember the basic plot beats but very little else.
For the first time in my Inheritance Cycle reread, I would genuinely recommend this book with only a few caveats. Basically, if you slogged through the first two and are wondering if this one is worth it, or if you remember not liking this book as much as a kid, I think you should give it a try.
Graphic: Death, Gore, Violence, Xenophobia, Blood, Grief, and War
Moderate: Ableism, Hate crime, Misogyny, Racism, Medical trauma, Death of parent, and Pregnancy
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
Graphic: Addiction, Biphobia, Homophobia, and Lesbophobia
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
5.0
This book is just as dark as the first one. Many horrifying things happen. It is a true dystopian exploration of a possible future from an author who keenly understood the many horrors at play in the United States. Some of it is so on the nose that it was hard to read. Some, especially the technology stuff, felt unlikely at times, but much more grounded than in almost any other near-future dystopian or sci-fi books I've read. Octavia E. Butler was just that good.
Also, this book has multiple central queer characters, which I never see mentioned when people are discussing it. Don't expect happy queer stories--Butler is as realistic about violent homophobia as she is about all other aspects of this world--but it is very present in ways that felt good and right as well as being harrowing.
Graphic: Adult/minor relationship, Child abuse, Child death, Confinement, Death, Emotional abuse, Gore, Gun violence, Hate crime, Homophobia, Misogyny, Pedophilia, Physical abuse, Racism, Rape, Sexual assault, Sexual violence, Slavery, Suicide, Torture, Violence, Forced institutionalization, Blood, Police brutality, Trafficking, Kidnapping, Grief, Religious bigotry, Death of parent, Murder, Pregnancy, Lesbophobia, Abandonment, War, and Classism
Moderate: Addiction, Drug abuse, Vomit, Medical content, and Fire/Fire injury
Minor: Incest
Ramona definitely said seven evil ex-boyfriends in volume one. Was she lying to Scott (which seems like a sensible approach honestly), or was this a retcon on the part of the creator? Or was Ramona just in denial? That also seems likely.
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
Eldest is better than Eragon in a lot of ways. It’s also still my least favorite book in the series.
Things I like:
- The elves. I love that they fill their days with hobbies that bring them fulfillment because their needs are met through magic. The fact that they are all vegan atheists is super interesting to me (and they are very reasonable vegans who still use wool and honey!). I love that they sing their houses out of the trees. And it was fun being reminded of all the technological advancements the elves have like indoor heating and alarm clocks.
- A lot of the philosophy discussions are super interesting. These books are definitely very utilitarian in their philosophy and while I don’t always like the choices of the characters or the narrative, I do feel like they make sense in context.
- Nasuada is complicated and not always likable (her approach to Elva is kind of awful, for example), but damn she’s a good leader and an interesting character.
- The gender politics of the world are still absolutely wretched, but a lot more women get to be actual characters in this book than in the first one. Queen Islanzadí has always been a favorite of mine, and she still is. There’s a lot more going on with the villagers, especially many of the women. All good things.
- The plot is far less derivative than in book one, I think because Paolini actually took the time to think about the ramifications of what he had written and to continue to explore them. That’s how we get Roran’s entire plotline as well as the Elva stuff: the author thinking through the choices he already made and seeing how they impact the characters and the world.
- The final twist is easy to see coming as an adult reader, but it still hits! Murtagh you will always be famous.
- Finally we are making Eragon question some of his beliefs, from human superstition to racism, and it’s not always done well, but I appreciate the effort.
- The scene with Roran and Jeod in Teirm. Yesyesyesyesyes.
- Expansions of the dwarves’ religion and clans and the animals of the Beor Mountains.
- The romance in this book (if you can call it that) is somehow even worse than I remembered. Arya is 100 years old. She repeatedly tells Eragon no. And he continues to pursue her. I hate it. It’s awful. The Saphira stuff makes a lot more sense, but of course Saphira has always been a more compelling character than Eragon with more coherent motivations. Eragon’s stuff with Arya is just so bad. Especially knowing where it ends up in the final book. It is impossible for me to root for any version of this relationship after Eragon’s behavior here.
- I think that Roran’s storyline is interesting, and I think that Roran makes a really effective Moses figure. Unfortunately I do not like him at all. He’s incredibly paternalistic. He has very little empathy. He’s basically a cult leader. Again, I think it’s effective, but I just do not like the man.
- What in the actual ever-loving fuck was going on with the descriptions of Nasuada’s skin tone in this book? It’s perfectly normal in book one (surprisingly so, honestly) and then suddenly in this one we have Roran asking if her skin is dyed????? Absolutely not.
- This is actually one of the most ableist books I’ve ever read, and for no discernible reason either. Why make Eragon disabled just to do a magical cure trope and give him superpowers? It’s cheap and it’s gross. I know that it was the early 2000s and the author was about 20 years old. I don’t care. The repeated messaging in this book that disabled people are weak and useless and need to be cured is so so harmful. And again, for what? There could have been such a rich exploration of disability here. Finding accommodations. Finding ways for Eragon to both be an overpowered chosen one AND a disabled character. But no, we got this instead. It’s awful. Probably my least favorite part of the entire series on this reread.
- Eragon is whiny and fantasy racist and weird about women. And then also he’s super smart and talented and ultimately succeeds at basically everything. He’s definitely the weak link here character-wise. Yikes.
- I really like the choice to give us some chapters from Roran and Nasuada’s POVs and I think those storylines add a lot. However, the structure is absolutely wretched. The book would have benefitted so much from just alternating between POVs more frequently.
- Important to note that about 200 pages of this book are basically just training montage. It is very slow. And then there’s a big battle at the end. Wretched pacing and structure.
- Paolini makes a big effort to show that the elves don’t have meaningful social OR biological sex/gender differences and then still continues to emphasize gender in his descriptions of elves and in their social customs. It is exhaustingly cishet man.
Graphic: Ableism, Animal death, Child death, Death, Genocide, Gore, Misogyny, Racism, Slavery, Suicide, Violence, Blood, Grief, Cannibalism, Death of parent, Murder, Pregnancy, and Injury/Injury detail
Moderate: Adult/minor relationship and Alcohol
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
I've definitely read this one before, but I did not remember the second half at all. Did I not actually finish it? Did I read it in a haze because I was going through traumatic life events at the time? Unclear.
Anyway, this book is so much better than The Color of Magic and The Light Fantastic that's it's kind of wild. There are still some bumpy bits. Pratchett is still working on fleshing out the world and figuring out exactly what it's for, and the big conflict that shows up in act three is kind of whatever, but this is the book in which Discworld stops being a silly fantasy parody series and starts becoming a rich tapestry of stories and characters and explorations of real-world themes through that signature Terry Pratchett wit.
I kind of wish we got more of Eskarina. She's interesting and then she's barely in any of the other books. Possibly just I Shall Wear Midnight but I could be wrong.
I love the introduction of Granny Weatherwax. She truly is one of the best parts of this world. Everything from her poor spelling to her headology to her moments of unbelievable power. I'm so excited to spend more time with her in other books. I'm glad she's in so many, some of which I haven't read before.
Favorite quotes/moments/misc reactions while reading:
- "Front doors in Bad Ass were used only by brides and corpses, and Granny had always avoided becoming either."
- "'They're both magic. If you can't learn to ride an elephant, you can at least learn to ride a horse.'
'What's an elephant?'
'A kind of badger,' said Granny. She hadn't maintained forest-credibility for forty years by ever admitting ignorance." - "Their wills clanged like cymbals and the air between them thickened. But Granny had spent a lifetime bending recalcitrant creatures to her bidding and, while Esk was a surprisingly strong opponent, it was obvious that she would give in before the end of the paragraph."
- It was just said that Granny's "grasp of geography was slightly worse than her grasp of subatomic physics." Me too.
- Absolutely wild talk of a "feminine code" involving lots of eye contact. Esk feels very autistic here. And queer also but separately. (And I absolutely stand by this.)
- "Granny, meanwhile, was two streets away. She was also, by the standards of other people, lost. She would not see it like that. She knew where she was, it was just that everywhere else didn't."
- Some incredibly unnecessary anti-Romani sentiment comes out of nowhere about a third of the way in. I don't like it.
- "Granny had nothing against fortune-telling provided it was done badly by people with no talent for it. It was a different matter if people who ought to know better did it, though. She considered that the future was a frail enough thing at best, and if people looked at it hard they changed it."
- Granny says that million-to-once chances "crop up nine times out of ten" and that's so true in fantasy.
Overall I think this book holds up and is a possible introduction to this world for anyone who likes witches and wants to get into the series.
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
Graphic: Child abuse and Domestic abuse
Moderate: Misogyny, Racism, Violence, and Injury/Injury detail
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.75
All of the elements are excellent here. This book is exploring some really compelling ideas: what does it mean to be a former chosen one or the sibling of a chosen one? What is good, what is evil, and what is the relationship between religion and morality? How do you rebuild your nation after a revolution? How do you find new relationships with your former colonial oppressors? Should you?
The characters are set up in really compelling ways. The dragons are fun. The world is queernormative and both main characters are queer (one is demisexual, one is a lesbian). The plot is good overall. It was just way too fast and completely lacking in any subtlety whatsoever. I felt extremely spoon-fed the entire time. I also felt like the book was rushing through instead of taking its time with the characters and concepts. I wonder if it was the author’s choice to make this one extremely rushed book instead of two slower, more thoughtful ones.
If there’s a sequel I will read it because I’m invested, but I was definitely slightly disappointed.
Graphic: Animal death, Bullying, Death, Violence, Xenophobia, and Colonisation