Scan barcode
bisexualwentworth's reviews
753 reviews
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
3.5
What I liked:
- The base premise—making Elizabeth a gay trans man living a double life and Mr. Darcy a gay cis man who's really awkward around women because he's not attracted to them and doesn't know how to interact with them—was fun and compelling and there was a lot of potential there.
- The writing style was fun and fast-paced.
- I loved the choice to make Charlotte a lesbian and to have her make similar choices to the original book but for different reasons. She very much feels like the same character, just an explicitly queer version of her, and I really liked that.
- Molly houses!
- Darcy was fun. Overall I think his characterization worked.
- Trans allies Aunt and Uncle Gardiner!
- The romance went waaaaaaay too fast but I did enjoy Oliver and Darcy's dynamic and chemistry a lot.
- The ending was a bit far-fetched but I don't care because it felt good and possible.
What I didn't like, random changes to Pride and Prejudice edition:
- Why are the characters aged down SO MUCH? I get that this is YA, but you can make it a coming-of-age story that is appropriate for and relatable to teen audiences without randomly making parents pressure SEVENTEEN YEAR OLDS into marriage??? And it made Georgiana and Lydia impossible to adapt properly, which in turn made the Wickham plot fall apart. Just generally a bad move.
- Why are they in London? I get that that's where more queer community would be, but Oliver only went to those queer spaces about twice, and having him travel somewhere larger and more queer later would have actually been much more impactful.
- Charlotte's last name was randomly changed, as was her family situation, and that was frustrating, mostly because it was so unnecessary.
What I didn't like, other:
- I liked what we got of Jane but her characterization was inconsistent and there wasn't enough of her (or of Bingley for that matter).
- The whole book was far too short. It's trying to tell about twice the story of the original novel in far fewer pages, so no wonder it doesn't quite pull it off. It needed at least another fifty pages.
- At first the dialogue was decently period-accurate and the narrative voice was more modern, which I liked, but it eventually devolved into so many anachronisms that I wondered why it was set in the Regency period at all. This was especially annoying because the author clearly did quite a lot of historical research for this book and then just ignored most of it.
- I hated the characterization of the Bennet parents. Yes Mr. Bennet would be more immediately accepting, but he definitely wouldn't actually do anything useful. And the Mrs. Bennet of the books is not an evil enforcer of gender roles. She's a silly person who is rightfully anxious about her children's futures and trying (not always well) to do what is best for them while her husband lazes around and makes sarcastic and often misogynistic comments about his family. This book did a disservice to that much more complex and interesting dynamic.
Overall, I think that the concept was strong and the book was fun, but the short length and a lot of unnecessary changes meant that it didn't quite do the job of being a compelling remix/reimagining of Pride and Prejudice. I've read better queer P&P fanfic on AO3, and it's a shame because I think this concept had SO MUCH potential. Truly if Novoa had just made the main characters and Charlotte explicitly queer, changed nothing else about the setting and characters, and then followed the plot through its logical changes throughout, and then tweaked accordingly, this book would have been absolutely stunning. Maybe I'll go write that on AO3 now. That seems like the thing to do.
Graphic: Deadnaming, Misogyny, and Transphobia
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.75
The pacing was very silly. The main plot/the thing that’s going to be the driving force of the planned series did not come into play until over halfway through.
There were also definitely some times when I was unsure how the characters had gotten from one scene to another. This is a problem I often have, so it may just be connected to my brain’s way of processing things, or it may be to do with the audiobook narration (which was very engaging and creative and which I recommend for sure). Regardless, I found aspects of the book slightly hard to follow at times, but never for very long.
There is some extremely intense content in this book, but the tone is much lighter than other fantasy books with similar content (The Poppy War comes to mind).
Graphic: Death, Gore, Violence, and Murder
Moderate: Child abuse, Child death, and Xenophobia
Minor: Transphobia and Religious bigotry
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
5.0
Graphic: Ableism, Bullying, Death, Gun violence, Misogyny, Racial slurs, Racism, Violence, Xenophobia, Colonisation, and Classism
Moderate: Genocide, Homophobia, Slavery, Death of parent, Murder, and War
Minor: Animal death
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
This book is really historically significant, and I appreciate it so much for being one of the first YA books to portray queer characters, especially lesbians, in a positive light and with a happy ending.
The story didn't make a particular impact on me, but the historical context did. I would definitely recommend it.
Graphic: Homophobia
Moderate: Classism
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Loveable characters? Yes
4.25
I made the mistake of pausing the audiobook in the middle of the pegging scene, and it took a few weeks to find a good moment to just straight into that, but once I did I finished the rest of the book very quickly.
Moderate: Biphobia, Emotional abuse, and Homophobia
Unfortunately, I did not personally enjoy Sacco's art style or method of storytelling very much, despite how effective I found it. I struggled with the dramatized version of the author. I struggled with the general bigotry and the misogyny. I think some of that is just the 90s. Most of it is the author's desire to give the book a narrative arc.
Overall, I think that this particular book was not for me, but I would highly recommend it to anyone at the beginning of their journey with understanding the history of Palestine as it gives a solid grounding if you don't know where to start and takes the reader on a journey from distaste to understanding and empathy.
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.75
Graphic: Death, Gore, Gun violence, Violence, and Colonisation
Did not finish book. Stopped at 8%.
I definitely couldn’t have written a better book as a teen, to be clear, and I still find this story very entertaining and fun and generally engaging. Saphira is one of my favorite dragon characters ever. Murtagh is wonderfully compelling. Christopher Paolini’s descriptions are very lush (sometimes overly so). And if I continue rereading more of the series I know I’ll enjoy Nasuada and Roran’s sections.
The gender of it all is just as messy and sloppy as I remembered, and the handling of disability is definitely abysmal and I don’t recall it getting better.
The worldbuilding and plot are generally unoriginal, but I really don’t care because 1) I enjoy it and 2) again, the author was SO YOUNG when he wrote it. There are some very silly aspects of the worldbuilding, though. I definitely assumed that the Ancient Language was much more of a conlang as a kid than it actually is. So much of it is just kinda sloppy Latin with some Japanese thrown in I feel like? Goofy.
Anyway I think that we need more overly long silly fun dragon books.
Graphic: Death, Gore, Violence, and Blood
Moderate: Ableism, Misogyny, and Xenophobia
Minor: Sexual assault