Scan barcode
auroraverlin's review against another edition
5.0
This book is a fascinating and terrifying look into the alt-right and alt-lite movements that got Trump elected in the United States. Although a fair amount of the book focuses on social media and how “freedom of speech” on social media platforms led in many cases to the sensationalism and outright lies made up by these people who take deep pride in their trolling abilities, I can’t resist a good character study. And that’s the most fascinating part of this book. Getting into the brains of this array of deplorables is absolutely fascinating, depressing and scary at the same time. The only unfortunate thing about this book is the people who really need to read it, who have been duped into believing the outright lies spun by these people, won’t.
tiboutoo's review against another edition
4.0
He takes you for an inside look at the alt-right, alt-light and the digital platforms that promote their voices. Very well written.
katymvt's review against another edition
2.0
Rounded up from 1.5
Pop Sugar reading challenge-a book about or involving social media.
All I can really say about this book is that I'm glad it's over. The author made some interesting and valid points. at the same time he seems to be completely blaming social media for the rise of the alt-right and neonazism, along with Donald Trump's election, which necessitates forgetting that original naziism, as well as the KKK, Joseph stalin, Pol Pot, and countless other hatred and atrocities did just fine without it.
Pop Sugar reading challenge-a book about or involving social media.
All I can really say about this book is that I'm glad it's over. The author made some interesting and valid points. at the same time he seems to be completely blaming social media for the rise of the alt-right and neonazism, along with Donald Trump's election, which necessitates forgetting that original naziism, as well as the KKK, Joseph stalin, Pol Pot, and countless other hatred and atrocities did just fine without it.
noahtiegs's review against another edition
5.0
Yeah, a very good book. Narrative journalism and me… we’ve got a special thing going on.
Anyway, on the book specifically. The first like four sections of the book were interesting, but not spectacular for me. I think that’s largely because I’m already aware of these online Nazis and fascists and the sites they use - but if you knew not a whole lot about it, I’m sure this book would be a great place to start. Also, the book was published in… 2019, I think? So it is older, especially by internet politics standards.
That being said, the last like three sections of the book… I mean, it’s some of the best non-fiction I’ve read, period. The narratives are SO compelling, and they paint such a great picture of how radicalization and de-radicalization happen. In addition, Marantz does such a fantastic job digging deeper into this radicalization and de-radicalization - is this just part of human nature? Should we forgive people? How much, and how? What should online platforms do? Is what we’re doing now good? It’s just… so good.
Anyway, on the book specifically. The first like four sections of the book were interesting, but not spectacular for me. I think that’s largely because I’m already aware of these online Nazis and fascists and the sites they use - but if you knew not a whole lot about it, I’m sure this book would be a great place to start. Also, the book was published in… 2019, I think? So it is older, especially by internet politics standards.
That being said, the last like three sections of the book… I mean, it’s some of the best non-fiction I’ve read, period. The narratives are SO compelling, and they paint such a great picture of how radicalization and de-radicalization happen. In addition, Marantz does such a fantastic job digging deeper into this radicalization and de-radicalization - is this just part of human nature? Should we forgive people? How much, and how? What should online platforms do? Is what we’re doing now good? It’s just… so good.
lmarrero's review against another edition
challenging
informative
reflective
medium-paced
4.75
In "Antisocial," Andrew Marantz delves into the rise of the far-right movement in America, particularly highlighting the role of the internet in fostering online extremism. The book serves as a thorough investigation into how fringe ideologies have gained traction through digital platforms, exploring the intricate relationship between social media, culture, and political discourse. Marantz employs a blend of personal narrative, investigative journalism, and political analysis to unpack the complexities of this phenomenon, ultimately aiming to illuminate the challenges faced by society in addressing the spread of extremist views.
This is the first time in a while I’ve read about about the far right and online extremism that I was not disappointed in!
1. **Informative and Sobering Insights on the Far Right:**
Marantz's work stands out as a well-researched and thought-provoking exploration of the far-right landscape. It offers readers a profound understanding of the motivations and mechanisms behind the rise of these ideologies. The book's depth and clarity make it an essential read for those seeking to comprehend the multifaceted nature of online extremism, providing a sobering reflection on the state of contemporary society.
2. **Application of Political Science to Online Extremism:**
One of the book's most compelling aspects is Marantz’s application of political science concepts to the digital realm of extremism. He effectively bridges the gap between theory and practice, illustrating how political ideologies manifest and evolve in online spaces. This analytical approach enriches the reader's comprehension of the topic, making the complexities of online extremism more accessible and relatable.
3. **Complexity of Solutions:**
Marantz does not shy away from the difficult realities of addressing online extremism. Unlike many works that propose overly prescriptive solutions, he acknowledges the intricacies involved in finding effective responses. This nuanced perspective is refreshing, as it avoids the pitfalls of simplistic solutions that often fail to consider the broader socio-political landscape. Marantz's acknowledgment of these complexities encourages a deeper dialogue about potential strategies to combat extremism without offering false hope.
4. **Neutrality and Humanization of Extremism:**
Perhaps one of the most powerful elements of "Antisocial" is Marantz's humanistic approach to those who have succumbed to extremism. By refraining from demonizing individuals, he fosters a more compassionate understanding of their experiences and motivations. This neutrality humanizes the phenomenon of online extremism, allowing readers to grasp the psychological and social factors at play. Such an approach is not only productive but essential for fostering meaningful conversations around prevention and intervention.
This is the first time in a while I’ve read about about the far right and online extremism that I was not disappointed in!
1. **Informative and Sobering Insights on the Far Right:**
Marantz's work stands out as a well-researched and thought-provoking exploration of the far-right landscape. It offers readers a profound understanding of the motivations and mechanisms behind the rise of these ideologies. The book's depth and clarity make it an essential read for those seeking to comprehend the multifaceted nature of online extremism, providing a sobering reflection on the state of contemporary society.
2. **Application of Political Science to Online Extremism:**
One of the book's most compelling aspects is Marantz’s application of political science concepts to the digital realm of extremism. He effectively bridges the gap between theory and practice, illustrating how political ideologies manifest and evolve in online spaces. This analytical approach enriches the reader's comprehension of the topic, making the complexities of online extremism more accessible and relatable.
3. **Complexity of Solutions:**
Marantz does not shy away from the difficult realities of addressing online extremism. Unlike many works that propose overly prescriptive solutions, he acknowledges the intricacies involved in finding effective responses. This nuanced perspective is refreshing, as it avoids the pitfalls of simplistic solutions that often fail to consider the broader socio-political landscape. Marantz's acknowledgment of these complexities encourages a deeper dialogue about potential strategies to combat extremism without offering false hope.
4. **Neutrality and Humanization of Extremism:**
Perhaps one of the most powerful elements of "Antisocial" is Marantz's humanistic approach to those who have succumbed to extremism. By refraining from demonizing individuals, he fosters a more compassionate understanding of their experiences and motivations. This neutrality humanizes the phenomenon of online extremism, allowing readers to grasp the psychological and social factors at play. Such an approach is not only productive but essential for fostering meaningful conversations around prevention and intervention.