skywhales's reviews
53 reviews

i like when books make me feel smart by making me feel just a littttllleee bit stupid but not so much that i feel totally lost. honestly i think the hype this got kind of intimidated me more going in than i ended up needing to be? like it felt like i'd overreacted in the end. honestly some of the reviews have me wondering if we read the same book. especially the people saying this is about how life is inherently Bad?? this seems to be quite blatantly saying the opposite

i know some people didn't like the book because of how long it takes for Plot to start happening but i was a kid who read those long plotless manuals about the magic system or bestiary for some kind of specific fantasy world. this was never a problem for me. i liked the journal entries i liked just wandering around the halls i liked the hint of the mystery we got!

all of the characters apart from piranesi felt pretty flat (maybe with the exception of

arne-sayles?

) but maybe that was on purpose. i can't really be too upset about it because after all the book is About piranesi. if we had to only flesh out one character it's good that it was him.

i liked raphael right up until we learned she was a cop :( will never ever be able to truly enjoy a cop character who is portrayed as a Righteous Force For Good and nothing is put into truly examining that idea. though i don't know what i expected from a book of this size and a specific story to tell.

definitely a book i will read again and probably take notes on because a couple of times i was like ohh if i was the kind of person who took notes on books i would make a note of this. couldn't write in this as it was a library book and i don't like writing inside of books anyway because i smudge everywhere but i need to start just. making documents again.

honestly if i leave you with one thing it is that this book is really not at all intimidating as long as you are the kind of person who likes reading about some pointless minutiae (and i am so it worked for me). and despite the awfulness of some of its characters i absolutely believe that this is a book about hopefulness and the beauty of humanity. and i continue to be a Sucker For That Shit.

if i had a nickel for every book i read recently set in the early 20th century with a focus on some aspect of the entertainment industry, i'd have two nickels. which isn't a lot but you know how the rest of it goes.

been bringing up carter a lot recently. i miss him.

not much to say on this one other than i didn't like it and idk how much of that was personal taste and how much of it was...well, distateful. was so excited for a masculine gay girl main character because i always am and she was fine, probably the best character from the book, but i didn't like much of the other stuff. they tried to make me sympathize with a cop.

the villain reveal left a bad taste in my mouth. kind of "if a girl dresses as a boy she's doing it for her own reasons but if a man dresses as a woman it means he's Fucked Up and Evil secretly. of course."

idk if they were trying to make an anti racist statement with peoples' treatment of clyde but it didn't land. and wtf was with pin's idolization of a movie about a female confederate soldier. some "margaret thatcher had girl power" type shit. 

didn't like the changing perspectives, they made the book too confusing and i didn't really care about many of the characters. i still don't know what was up with lionel. am i just stupid? did i not Get this book? was it actually really deep and intelligent? idk maybe. i just did not have a good time.

so fun fact about me, i was the world's biggest coward as a kid. i was scared of everything. including certain episodes of spongebob. an episode of martha speaks (you know, the show about the talking dog for six year olds?) gave me Nightmares. at the top of the list of all of these many, many fears was zombies. which is a little silly looking back on it. the public perception of these guys is that they're slow-moving, literally brainless creatures that are only really threatening in large groups, and even then they're one of the easiest supernatural creatures to kill. even when i grew out of the fear, i've never really had interest in reading zombie apocalypse fiction because of its tendency for Big Military Action Scenes. honestly this turns me off of a lot of apocalypse fiction, mostly the kind that involves fighting a lot of guys. that and it just makes me depressed.

but. i am always a sucker for Getting Creative With It. 

see now this isn't the only zombie story to take the route it does (and i mean come on, cordyceps is like Made for this kinda shit. right up there with chronic wasting disease on the "wouldn't it suck like so bad if humans could get this?" chart) but this was a few years back now so i'm willing to assume it was quite novel at the time and for me, a zombie noob, it's still quite novel now. though i know the last of us did something similar because i heard about the last of us everywhere. and i still liked it! especially That Bit at the end. even if i kind of predicted the twist regarding melanie and the other kids being a new kind of zombie.

characters were...well i liked the women the most but isn't that usually a given. melanie was good. i enjoy precocious kids especially if they're somehow Important but can't fully grasp the how or why of it until they start using it to their benefit. helen was fun, even if her whole "i'm trying to stay detached" chapter at the beginning felt kind of pointless, especially considering it never became relevant again. why couldn't she just genuinely be the Fun Teacher who cares about the kids a little too much? it felt so pointless and weird. but whatever. dr. caldwell is always a character archetpye i enjoy at the very least because they're just fun to read about. yay fucked up scientists yay!

her reaction to her blood poisoning and her death was very fitting for her and i liked that she stayed true to her character till the end.

gallagher was fine. he was kind of sweet. but. god this is going to make me sound like an asshole but i just cannot relate to straight men narrators. no. hey. fuck that's not even true because i related to carter my good friend charles carter from a few books ago just fine! but it's because he didn't talk or think about women like they were pieces of meat! and that guy was from the 1920s! (no way to tell what the real guy thought about them now but you know what i'm getting at here.) i KNOW. it adds realism to the text and all that i KNOW this is a matter of personal taste i KNOW it makes me less of an objective reader but men being rampantly horny about women who aren't into them just gives me the fucking ick!! whatever people will be sexually attracted to each other. i KNOW. but this shit will probably make me like the book less. had the same problem with sergeant parks but honestly my bigger issue was trying to push the narrative that he was bonding all cutely with melanie when he Tried To Choke Her. we remember that right. we remember he did that. man you can't found family that out of existence. he probably did worse. and i KNOW he's like a tough military guy or whatever but i don't care. this is the exact reason why i don't like tough military guys and i don't like the fetishization of men's anger.

any of the "romantic" bits between him and helen made me roll my eyes SO hard.

see 99% of the time i just can't get behind stuff trying to make me sympathize with soldiers or cops. and that's probably just how it's gonna be.

i liked the beginning and ending of the book the most. still don't really think apocalypse fiction is for me, for a multitude of reasons, but i probably enjoyed this more than i'd enjoy most of it. not much else to say--i've read better, but i've read much, much worse.