Scan barcode
shottel's reviews
35 reviews
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
Graphic: Gun violence, Transphobia, Violence, Trafficking, Toxic friendship, and Dysphoria
Moderate: Animal death, Body horror, Deadnaming, Domestic abuse, Hate crime, Homophobia, Physical abuse, Rape, Sexual assault, Sexual content, Sexual violence, Blood, Kidnapping, Alcohol, and Sexual harassment
Minor: Suicide
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.25
Graphic: Body horror, Chronic illness, Death, Emotional abuse, Gore, Miscarriage, Racism, Violence, Blood, Religious bigotry, Injury/Injury detail, and Classism
Moderate: Child death, Confinement, Homophobia, Incest, Infertility, Racial slurs, Rape, Sexual assault, Sexual violence, Kidnapping, Pregnancy, Fire/Fire injury, Alcohol, and Colonisation
Minor: Slavery, Vomit, Medical content, and War
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.75
The writing style is immaculate as well, with perfect balance and flow and a dry sense of sarcasm. The presentation choices (font, spacing, etc.) present this book like great work of literature, like a fancy looking Bible, and it manages to earn these dressings. The plot is well-paced, with just the right amount of twists and turns. I couldn’t suggest a single phrasing or word choice or paragraph restructuring that I feel would be better.
The sole reason this is not a 5/5 review is that for all its excellence in depicting numerous different ethnic groups and people of different ages and abilities, the identity of the author as a straight man comes through. It’s the sole mark against the book’s virtual universality, an impressive feat given it’s situated very firmly in interwar-period Pennsylvania. Nevertheless, the repeated references to women’s breasts and buttocks and the greater priority men have in the story, among other things, was hard for me to miss.
Nevertheless, this book is still very close to a must-read. If you can manage the lengthy list of heavy topics the book covers (it pulls absolutely no punches with regards to the difficulties of life) and you think you even might possibly be interested in the setting and style, it’s worth your time.
Graphic: Child abuse, Confinement, Death, Mental illness, Pedophilia, Racial slurs, Racism, Sexual assault, Sexual violence, Violence, Forced institutionalization, Antisemitism, Murder, and Sexual harassment
Moderate: Hate crime, Rape, Excrement, Religious bigotry, and Alcohol
Minor: Infidelity, Slavery, Medical content, Death of parent, Colonisation, and Classism
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
5.0
There are other things that make it interesting. It’s definitely LGBT fiction, depicting a variety of different gender and sexuality regimes. Without spoiling anything, it’s very subtly implied that the main character is an awful judge of character and intention, which contributes to the political mystery that unfolds. The book in general is frequently very understated, from the setting to the characters, but there’s just barely enough to make sure you can realize there’s more than meets the eye. And this is very much a me thing, but I found it significant: The font choice was perfect. The majority of the letters, the normal lowercase ones, are positively generic. But the italics and capitalized letters are quite interesting - something that’s hard to catch from the main text, but fits with the overall mesh of the book: A world of characters who look and act and pretend like everything is fine, but in reality the interesting parts keep forcing through.
The interestingly different structure of the book combined with the positively creative use of sci-fi to depict alternate societies leads me to highly recommend this book.
Graphic: Confinement, Death, Emotional abuse, Gun violence, Violence, Blood, Kidnapping, Murder, and War
Moderate: Deadnaming and Panic attacks/disorders
Minor: Religious bigotry and Alcohol
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
This tonal dissonance is can be very amusing, but sometimes is too outwardly stated; by 50 pages in the very pleasing image a housewife intent on killing abusive men has set in, so when she acts cheery as can be while lying about her weekend there’s no need to state that she’s lying. We can pick it up on our own.
Other than being a little too forward with the protagonist’s moral complexity and the rare confusingly constructed sentence, the mystery also didn’t take too much hold on the plot. By the halfway point the picture was fairly clear, and the question began to shift to “well, how do we solve this problem?” Not complaining too much about it, just found it odd it was billed as a mystery novel.
Despite these issues, I enjoyed reading it. It got several laughs out of me and I loved the representation. The love triangle was also well done, nuanced by the way their very different personalities influenced Daisy. Some people may not like how the love triangle is resolved, but I was okay with it.
Overall, if this book seems interesting to you, I recommend it.
Graphic: Misogyny, Sexism, and Murder
Moderate: Addiction, Death, Domestic abuse, Drug abuse, Kidnapping, and Alcohol
Minor: Cancer, Infidelity, Sexual violence, Trafficking, and Abandonment
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.75
Moderate: Sexual content and Alcohol
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.75
Moderate: Fire/Fire injury and Sexual harassment
Minor: Alcoholism, Violence, and Alcohol
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.5
Still, I would say it’s better than Gideon and a mark worse than Harrow - which is to say, it’s very good. I had a harder time following the plot than before, and while Muir makes great strides with diversity in this book, it sometimes comes off a tad awkward (like in the repeated misgendering of a character with they/them pronouns, just for them to correct themselves). But those are pretty small problems compared to the rest of this deeply dark and funny novel. If you liked Gideon and Harrow, I highly recommend it.
Graphic: Addiction, Body horror, Death, Gore, Gun violence, Mental illness, Violence, Blood, Fire/Fire injury, Toxic friendship, and Injury/Injury detail
Moderate: Body shaming, Bullying, Eating disorder, Panic attacks/disorders, Suicide, Transphobia, Medical content, and Alcohol
Minor: Drug use, Sexual violence, Vomit, and Trafficking
Did not finish book. Stopped at 7%.
Additionally, Crescent City is supposed to be the more "mature" line in Maas's portfolio. To be entirely frank, it felt a little bit like an 18 year old's idea of what "mature" means. The characters you are immediately introduced to are painted as irresponsible punks, but also hold positions of prestige; they are highly respected, but also get to skip lines and do drugs. I'm aware I stopped right before the plot picked up, but this is how they spent the first 50 pages establishing the world. It's not the kind of "mature" I'm looking for.
If you're like me, then you might want to try something else. But if you like this kind of story, or Maas's other works, then don't let me dissuade you. The writing is solid, and the world is interesting. I just couldn't get with the characters, and how they were presented.
Moderate: Sexual content and Alcohol
Minor: Drug use, Slavery, and Sexual harassment