Take a photo of a barcode or cover
discardeddustjacket's reviews
317 reviews
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
4.75
This story is an incredibly imaginative and deeply moving study of generational trauma, the struggle between the importance of remembering and the need to survive, and the power of community—of a people, as one, sharing the weight of history together, grieving and celebrating together.
And beyond that, I love how this book, like its characters, can’t exist on its own. Solomon openly embraces the direct inspiration that birthed the story’s central mythology: a song of the same name by clipping., who, in turn, acknowledges its origins in the work of Detroit-based musical duo Drexciya.
The afterword puts it beautifully:
“We prefer to imagine each of these objects as artifacts—as primary sources—each showing a different angle on a world whose nature can never be observed in totality. … Experiencing these works requires labor—something like that of an archaeologist who’s discovered multiple texts about the Drexciyan civilization [the underwater society descended from the children of drowned, pregnant enslaved women that forms this story] and is tasked with assembling a picture of that civilization.”
Graphic: Death, Gore, Self harm, Slavery, Violence, Blood, Grief, Suicide attempt, and War
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
4.5
The found family, the aromantic representation, the generous use of neopronouns, not to mention the quality of the story-telling in general—I just loved everything about this.
“We all live by these expectations, which we call laws of nature … yet is not nature that which plays out around us every day? Should we not draw laws from what we observe, rather than perpetuate some false thing that crumbles weakly before the truth of our lives?”
Graphic: Mental illness, Transphobia, Acephobia/Arophobia, and Fire/Fire injury
Minor: Deadnaming, Domestic abuse, Self harm, and Suicide attempt
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
4.25
This story is both tender and gut-wrenching. I loved Jam as a protagonist and her relationships with both Pet and Redemption. I loved the depictions of dissociation and non-verbal communication.
The theme of justice, especially in a post-prison society was also handled really well, I think. I just really appreciated all the different elements of the story, from the building of the town of Lucille and the quasi mythology surrounding its revolutionary history, to the magical realism, to the character relationships. It was all so well-crafted.
Graphic: Body horror, Gore, Torture, and Blood
Moderate: Child abuse, Incest, and Pedophilia
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
5.0
I am obsessed with Tennal and Surit. I think the relationship dynamic where one person is an earnest, honorable, controlled type with encyclopedic knowledge of rules and regulations, while the other is a petulant, rebellious, flirtatious chaos gremlin might just be my new favorite.
I also loved—and I don’t know if this was intentional—the way this story kind of turned the sci-fi/fantasy romance trope of a “soul bond” on its head and turned it into something dangerous. There’s so many stories about protagonists in a romance who develop this telepathic connection wherein they’re able to feel what their partner is feeling and hear what they’re thinking, and this is often something the reader is rooting for—something to be celebrated.
But here it feels like the author is asking us to consider: “Would that truly be healthy? What if it resembled something destructive? What if it led to the parties involved losing themselves as individuals?”
Overall, I really really really loved this book.
Graphic: Addiction, Confinement, Drug abuse, Mental illness, and Death of parent
Moderate: War
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.0
This is strong story-telling precisely because, despite involving things like talking pigs, euthanasia rollercoasters, robotic dogs, and mortuary services that liquify a loved one and turn them into an ice sculpture, these stories are mainly about people. They’re about family, they’re about community, they’re about hope, and they’re about love.
It didn’t get a higher rating simply because by about 75% of the way through, I had mentally checked out and was kind of forcing myself to continue. But I would still recommend this book to any sci-fi lover.
Graphic: Child death, Death, Gore, Suicide, Terminal illness, Grief, and Death of parent
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
5.0
It does read like poetry. I found it often helps to read out loud—to taste the words as you’re reading them—and I think that’s entirely intentional. There’s so much emphasis put on words in this story: the consumption (literal and figurative) of words, words as connection, and words as shelter.
“Words can wound—but they’re bridges, too. … To paraphrase a prophet: Letters are structures, not events. Yours give me a place to live inside.” (95)
I now understand what everyone was talking about. What a masterpiece. All I want to do now is re-read it.
Graphic: Violence, Murder, and War
Did not finish book. Stopped at 42%.
It’s like the author doesn’t trust the reader to be empathetic or clever enough to deduce how a character is feeling if they don’t spend ten pages explaining their emotions in a hundred different ways. We get it! She’s conflicted! You could have communicated that in one paragraph, max!
I swear, every chapter has to have at least one instance where our protagonist, Delora, thinks to herself something along the lines of: “I can’t believe I’m here with a Duskwalker!”/“This is so wild, he’s a Duskwalker!”/“I must be insane, how can my body be responding this way to a DuSKwAlKeR!?1!” I was ready to throw my phone across the room.
Not to mention all of the world-building is accomplished through tedious exposition. The entire first chapter is basically just the protagonist thinking about her life and the town she lives in, in order to spell out to the reader everything they need to know about her backstory. It’s heavy-handed and boring to wade through.
For instance, in this story we meet Delora as she is being transported from her village to the edge of the veil in the first chapter, where we learn that the intent is to throw her from a cliff as punishment for her crimes. And through Delora’s memories, the entire story of her crimes is then explained. Imagine instead, if the story began with Delora falling from that cliff and the reader, as well as Magnar, are left to question why she’s there. What if it was only after the two of them develop a relationship built on trust that Delora reveals her story while sharing it with Magnar (and by extension the reader). That would’ve been so much more interesting and would’ve given the story so much tension and easy propulsion.
I’m sorry this seems harsh, because I enjoyed the first book in this series (even though I think this problem was prevalent to a lesser degree in that one too) but this was just too much. 270 pages in and I was like “is this thing wrapping up yet?” And I was only 40% of the way through!!
Graphic: Body shaming, Bullying, Fatphobia, Infidelity, Mental illness, Suicidal thoughts, Murder, Pregnancy, and Injury/Injury detail
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
4.0
I really admired how Àbíké-Íyímídé used her characters to highlight a lot of the many ways that whiteness manifests to harm Black people. There’s the outwardly violent and malicious folks, but then there’s the white character whose family is poor and doesn’t necessarily benefit from class privilege, but who resents Black people for what they view as “affirmative action” or unearned advancement, and harnesses their white privilege to exert power.
Then there’s the “decent” white person who recognizes the harm of systemic racism and wants to be viewed as separate from it, but also does nothing to challenge it because it’s “too big” and they’re just one person—one person who continues to benefit it.
Graphic: Bullying, Drug use, Homophobia, Mental illness, Racial slurs, Racism, Sexual assault, Car accident, Suicide attempt, Gaslighting, Toxic friendship, and Classism
Minor: Fire/Fire injury
1.0
So I don’t hold it against Baek Sehee that this book missed the mark for me. It was wildly popular in Korea, so it has accomplished its goal, it has nothing to prove to me whatsoever.
However, since I did read it, here are my thoughts: it did a remarkable job of really highlighting the differences in how mental health is treated in Korea versus America. I audibly gasped at some of the things being said by the psychiatrist, like “Don’t think about the future too much. Your anxiety can become a burden to others” (page 57). That sort of professional advice would not be tolerated here.
I really didn’t find the format of this book very useful. It had potential, but more than anything I felt as though the therapy transcripts sort of became repetitive and didn’t quite go anywhere. Perhaps that’s the point—to show that progress is slow and doesn’t always announce itself in flashing neon letters, but that doesn’t mean it isn’t happening.
I understand that Sehee’s aim was to, in her words, “hold my hand up high and shout, I’m right here, hoping that someone would see me waving, recognize themselves in me and approach me, so we could find comfort in each other’s existence,” and to that end, I think the book is successful. Perhaps in a culture where mental health is just not talked about, transcribing and publishing one’s therapy sessions is itself a bold act, and reading them is validating for those who feel alone in their struggles.
Like I said, it just wasn’t for me. And that’s okay.
Graphic: Body shaming, Bullying, Domestic abuse, Fatphobia, and Alcohol
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.5
I truly do not understand why I had so much trouble following the plot! I mean, this book is literally for children; it’s considered a middle grade fantasy. 13 year-olds are grasping this story and apparently I couldn’t!
There’s just SO much going on. The missing prince/wizard plus the Witch of the Waste and her curse on Howl (the parameters of which, I still don’t really get—it was taken from lines of a poem? Or something? But like when and how did she place it on him and how does it actually give her power over him?) plus Sophie’s curse plus Howl and Calcifer’s contract plus… Wales?
There’s so many curses and characters under curses that I had trouble keeping straight. I just felt like I needed to have a whiteboard handy so that I could map out all the characters, their curses, and their connections to one another, etc.
And why was Miss Angorian (who is apparently the Witch’s fire demon? Huh?) working as a school teacher to Howl’s nephew in Wales? Like I’m SO LOST!!!