EDIT: apparently this is my 300th book? word

i don’t really know how to describe my thoughts to be honest. it’s provocative and unique, that’s for sure. 

that being said, tho, i did not get the point of the play until i read the author’s notes at the end. there was a lot going on and it wasn’t really connected until the end. and as a personal preference i don’t really like meta-moments in plays.

i think the merit of this play would be in the discussion that comes from it, not necessarily the actually acts themselves. and since i sit here in a tokyo library with no one to talk to, i can only base my review on how much i enjoyed reading it

in a couple years ill try rereading it with the intended message in mind