Scan barcode
A review by isd
Endgame by Loren L. Coleman
4.0
That's it, the Classic BattleTech storyline is now read. So many things remain(ed) incomplete :/ What about the WoB freaks? And everyone else? I WANTED TO KNOW!
I've never been a huge fan of Coleman's style with all the religious crap, though B.L. Pardoe was even worse... almost unreadably so. Bah! And while I'm at it: Coleman's depiction of the Wolves in Exile was a bit boring, very unClanlike in general. Then again, only Stackpole has written those damn Wolves in a tolerable manner, so I guess I'll just keep complaining. There's only one Blood of Kerensky -trilogy and this one isn't it.
Endgame itself went pretty quickly. The endless fights were mostly skimmed, parts were explained here and there but that's most likely because of the scale. Somehow I'd enjoyed a bit more of the political backstabbage, not to mention some more details of the Assassin's "adventures".
Oh, and was a bit sappy but not overexplained, so I can't complain much I guess :)
I've never been a huge fan of Coleman's style with all the religious crap, though B.L. Pardoe was even worse... almost unreadably so. Bah! And while I'm at it: Coleman's depiction of the Wolves in Exile was a bit boring, very unClanlike in general. Then again, only Stackpole has written those damn Wolves in a tolerable manner, so I guess I'll just keep complaining. There's only one Blood of Kerensky -trilogy and this one isn't it.
Endgame itself went pretty quickly. The endless fights were mostly skimmed, parts were explained here and there but that's most likely because of the scale. Somehow I'd enjoyed a bit more of the political backstabbage, not to mention some more details of the Assassin's "adventures".
Spoiler
His end's quickness was a surprise to me anyway.Oh, and