James Coe's The New University is a book very much of a particular moment during the economic and social recovery from COVID in Britain. Some of the policy concerns have moved on since it was written, but there is something still relevant here: the issue of what universities are meant to be doing, from how they relate to the local businesses around them to how they contribute to the economy, and how they should be funded.

I find it odd that Coe discusses things like providing flexible learning, and fails to mention the Open University even once. Many of the things he describes as being things universities need to do have a pioneer in the OU, and it isn't some upstart flash-in-the-pan newcomer. It's been established for a long time now and it's doing many of the things Coe thinks that traditional universities should do. I wonder if he's just blind to the OU because he works in a traditional university? Contemptuous of what the OU does and the value of its qualifications? I'm not sure, but it's a strange omission.

Coe is very optimistic about universities and what they can give to the country. He does touch on what they offer to individuals as well, to some extent (in part through his own nostalgia for his time at university), though it's very much about what universities can do on a broader level.

It's interesting, but obviously dated already, and containing some odd omissions. Also, like the other Inklings book I've read, it does need a better proofreader.