Wow this book got me thinking. The sharings of the first two monks really resonated with me and I agreed with pretty much everything they said. However the thing is because I agreed so much with them I find it hard right now to recall what they said. However the third monk on the other hand… His writings are so blunt and straight-forward it got me questioning if it even was a correct representation of Buddhist values and beliefs. Do I agree with him? Not in any way, shape or form. But I absolutely loved reading him because it got me thinking and arguing with him in my head and in my head I recall most of his thoughts. What an important revelation it is to realize the more you read things you don’t agree with the better.