???? this book screams first wave feminism. where is the intersectionality???? where is the substance?!?!?!? where is the flavour?!?!???

i would argue this has some interesting (yet under explored) points about misandry but contributes little to no original thought. it felt like an attempt to poke the bear (the bear in question, of course, being heteronormative, cis men and patriarchal culture overall) but every time it got close to making an excellent point, it fizzled out?