Scan barcode
Reviews tagging 'Murder'
A Mother's Reckoning: Living in the Aftermath of Tragedy by Sue Klebold
28 reviews
rplunceford's review against another edition
4.5
The book is a must for any parent. Understanding the tendencies of depressed, suicidal, or potentially violent adolescents is paramount to helping kids deal with the inevitable pressures of life. Dylan was clearly not a poster child for this sort of viloence and yet, he did the unthinkable.
Graphic: Suicide, Violence, and Murder
ryanferguson83's review against another edition
5.0
Graphic: Suicide, Violence, and Murder
akateb71489's review against another edition
4.5
Graphic: Child death, Gun violence, Suicide, Religious bigotry, and Murder
Moderate: Bullying, Child death, Death, Hate crime, and Injury/Injury detail
teddereadsbooks's review against another edition
4.0
Graphic: Bullying, Child death, Death, Gore, Gun violence, Hate crime, Mental illness, Panic attacks/disorders, Racism, Suicidal thoughts, Suicide, Xenophobia, Grief, Mass/school shootings, Murder, and Toxic friendship
qqbear's review against another edition
5.0
Graphic: Suicide, Mass/school shootings, and Murder
chupacabra2000's review against another edition
4.0
She breaks it down in every single way and angle I could possibly think of, not just how SHE feels about it - but the scientific research and the statistics of suicide, homicide and prevention possible. She does it without stigmatizing or judging people who suffer from mental illness, which is a fine line in these particular cases. She sure has a way with words!
Four stars for not doing it for money - but to open some eyes and send all profits from the book to charities concerning suicide prevention.
Graphic: Child death, Death, Gun violence, Mental illness, Suicidal thoughts, Suicide, Violence, Grief, Mass/school shootings, and Murder
haloblues's review against another edition
5.0
I have nothing but the utmost respect and empathy for Sue Klebold. I can't say my opinion of her was changed or improved by her account - but only because, from the little I knew of her before reading, there had already been no doubt in my mind that she had not been to blame for the tragedy that occurred. Her anguish, guilt, and deep questioning of whether or not she could have prevented it, done something differently, seen signs or read further into an off-hand comment, only cement that impression in my mind, and her pain bleeds palpably off the page and into your heart.
While Dave Cullen's biography focused on the what, the technical details and the victims' recoveries, Sue details something far more personal and emotional - her experience as the mother of not just a killer, but a human boy struggling so deeply with mental illness (or, as Sue refers to it throughout this book for reasons illustrated in the quotations below, brain illness) that he would die by his own hand.
She makes no attempt to justify his actions, nor does she remove accountability from her son. She is so intent on not doing so, in fact, that she often comes across as self-flagellating, reassuring readers over and over that she is not excusing him, nor her own perceived part in it.
Upon closing this book, my opinion remains thus: I truly believe that Sue Klebold is and was a good person, a good mother, and a good influence. She, in my estimation, did all she could with the information she had at the time, and went above and beyond to care for her children and instill within them good morals and life lessons. She appears to be nothing less than sincere, truly compassionate and fair, and has since dedicated her life to activism, mental health awareness, and suicide prevention. I can only say that it is truly depressing and frustrating that today, in 2022, 23 years post-Columbine and 6 since the publication of this book, not to mention many mass shootings later, we still seem no closer to gun control in America. God hopes that changes before many more like the fifteen victims of Columbine are lost.
Favourite quotes:
Ovid delivered a famous injunction to "welcome this pain, for you will learn from it." But there is little choice about such pain; you do not have the option of not welcoming it. You can express displeasure at its arrival, but you cannot ask it to leave the house.
In writing this book, I hope to honor the memories of the people my son killed. The best way I know how to do that is to be truthful, to the best of my ability. And so, this is the truth: my tears for the victims did eventually come, and they still do. But they did not come that day.
In other cases, such plans are simply sign and symptom of the genuinely "broken" logic driving the suicidal brain. They may signal the ambivalence the person feels - a desire to live that is, at times, as strong as the desire to die. A person with intent to self-harm can also believe simultaneously in both realities: that they will take a Caribbean vacation, and that they will have died by suicide before they have the chance to go.
A local reporter tried to push his way into my eighty-five-year-old aunt's home in Ohio. (She was proud she'd stood up to him by asking him to leave, though she insisted he take a fresh-baked cookie with him.)
How could I convey empathy, when even hearing my name would likely increase the suffering these families were feeling? How could I reach out, as a companion in sorrow, when my son - the person I had created and loved more than life - was the reason they were in agony? How do you say, "I'm sorry my child killed yours"?
Quote in the paper about cancer patients. It said "The people who do well create a place in their mind and their spirit where they are well, and they live from that place." This is what we are doing. Tom's analogy is that a tornado has destroyed our house, and we can only live in one part of it. This is what living with grief is like. You dwell in that small place where you can function.
The theologian C. S. Lewis begins A Grief Observed, his beautiful meditation on the death of his wife, with these words: "No one ever told me that grief felt so like fear."
As I wrote in my journal: I've learned two important things. One, that there are many good, kind people out there. And two, there are many people who have suffered greatly and who keep going with strength and courage. These are the ones who can eventually support others. I hope I can be of some use to someone some day.
The psychologists who reviewed the tapes would come to a similar conclusion: that Eric relied on Dylan's slow-burning, depressive anger to fuel and feed his sadism, while Dylan used Eric's destructive impulses to jolt him out of his passivity.
You will notice that I use the terms "brain illness" and "brain health" throughout this book, as opposed to the more commonly used "mental illness" and "mental health". That decision was the result of a conversation I had with Dr. Jeremy Richman, a neuroscientist whose daughter, Avielle Rose Richman, was one of the children murdered by Adam Lanza at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut. Dr. Richman and his wife, Jennifer Hensel, a scientist and medical writer, founded the Avielle Foundation in their daughter's honor, hoping to remove the stigma for people seeking help, to develop the concept of a "brain health check-up", and to identify behavioral and biochemical diagnostics to detect those at risk of violent behaviors.
In our conversation, Dr. Richman explained: "'Mental' is invisible. It comes with all the fear, trepidation, and stigma of things we don't understand. But we know there are real, physical manifestations within the brain that can be imaged, measured, quantified, and understood. We need to move our understanding to the visible world of brain health and brain disease, which is tangible."
Whereas Eric's [journal] is full of narcissistic condescension and bloodthirsty rage, Dylan's is focused on loneliness, depression, ruminations, and preoccupation with finding love. Eric drew pictures of weapons, swastikas, and soldiers; Dylan drew hearts.
One day, Dylan came home, his shirt spotted with ketchup. He refused to tell me what had happened, only that he'd had "the worst day of his life." I pressed, but Dylan downplayed it, and I let him. Kids have disagreements, I thought. Whatever it is, it'll blow over - and if it doesn't, I'll know. There has been reporting that the incident was more serious than I could ever have imagined: a circle of boys taunting Dylan and Eric, shoving them, spraying them with ketchup, and suggesting they were gay. That incident alone may not explain the deadly kinship forged between the boys, but it is the kind of shared humiliation in which a bond is formed.
I have always loved trees. I'm inspired by their fortitude and character - their knots and scars and burls, the sites of so many injuries and so much life - and by their generosity, the way they uncomplainingly provide shade and oxygen and food and shelter and fuel. Trees are both deeply grounded and aspirational; they never stop reaching.
If I had thought there was something seriously wrong with him, I would have moved mountains to fix it. If I had known about Eric's website or the guns, or about Dylan's depression, I would have parented differently. As it was, I parented the best way I knew to parent the child I knew - not the one he had become without my knowledge.
If you hurt your knee, you wouldn't wait until you couldn't walk before seeking help. You'd ice the joint, elevate it, skip your workouts - and then, if you didn't see any improvement after a couple of days, you'd make an appointment with an orthopedist. Unfortunately, most people don't turn to a mental health professional until they're in real crisis. Nobody expects to heal their knees themselves, using self-discipline and gumption. Because of stigma, though, we do expect to be able to think our way out of the pain in our minds.
As soon as my own anxiety disorder was under control and I began to emerge from the quicksand, it was suddenly as clear as day: a brain health crisis was a health issue, the same as a heart condition, or a torn ligament. As with those health issues, it can be treatable. But first it has to be caught and diagnosed. Every day, mammograms and breast exams help doctors catch and treat cancers they would have missed fifty years ago. I survived cancer myself because of these, and can only hope that someday we'll have screenings and interventions at least as effective for brain health.
Graphic: Child death, Death, Gun violence, Mental illness, Suicidal thoughts, Suicide, Violence, Grief, Mass/school shootings, Murder, and Toxic friendship
Moderate: Homophobia, Misogyny, Racism, and Sexism
abby_can_read's review against another edition
3.0
I wasn't sure what to expect when I read this book. The heartbreak and anguish Klebold experienced and wrote made me sob.
Graphic: Gun violence, Suicide, and Mass/school shootings
Moderate: Bullying, Suicidal thoughts, and Murder
Minor: Cancer, Child death, and Drug abuse
thornemere's review against another edition
2.0
I was full of fury toward her in the beginning of the book. She continually talked about her "sunshine boy" and how wonderful, sweet, funny, kind, compassionate, etc. he was as a child. This attitude toward him carried through middle school and into high school. She pushed a narrative that he was an angel and must have been brainwashed or coerced into his actions at Columbine. But, at 50% through the book I highlighted this passage and thought that maybe she was going to begin to get into the side of him she didn't see but that was obviously there (she didn't).
The buffer I’d clung to all those months—believing he’d been an unwitting or coerced participant, or acting in a moment of madness—was gone. The evil face I’d seen on the tapes was a side of him I did not recognize, a side I’d never seen during his life. After seeing the tapes, it was really hard not to say, That devil—that is who he was.
Even after that passage, she continues to justify. She has an excuse for everything that Dylan thought or did, putting blame or responsibility on counselors, friends, classmates, teachers, etc. When she would finally acknowledge that Dylan made the conscious choice to go through with the massacre she would soften the statement with systems or institutions that failed him. He wouldn't have done it if only (insert blame here).
She praises her family and her "good boys" Byron and Dylan. She talks about how wonderful they were (aside from one challenging year), how intelligent and well-behaved. She goes on about what a loving, respectful, and happy family they were but then she also shares passages like these:
Byron was the kid who whizzed out of the restaurant bathroom, straight into the waitress with the loaded tray. He was the kid who hooked a plate of potato salad so it crashed into his own face, pie-fight style, while demonstrating an armpit fart—and then did it again with a bowl of oatmeal the next morning during a breakfast reenactment. It was pure boyish tomfoolery without an ounce of malice in it. Even Tom was usually laughing too hard at Byron’s antics to get mad.
Fed up, I got in his face. I shoved him against the fridge, pinning him there with my hand. Then I waved my finger and gave him a real mom lecture. I didn’t yell, but there was authority in my voice as I told him he had to stop being so crabby and selfish. “The world doesn’t revolve around you, Dylan. It’s time for you to think about the other people in this family. You need to start carrying your weight.” Then I reminded him he had forgotten Mother’s Day.
She continually brings up experts in the field of psychology and statements they made that either defended, excused, or explained Dylan's choices and behavior. This is a tactic used frequently by people who bring up authority figures in a field as a way to restrict or limit potential criticism. It's used in a way that implies, "See, this expert says this thing that agrees with what I'm saying so you can't criticize or question anything I'm saying" but a quick search through Google shows that there are other experts who feel differently about Dylan and his role / involvement in the massacre. Sue only shares the ones that defend her POV.
It is also evident that even after all this time she places the overwhelming majority of the blame on Eric Harris. The focus on Dylan is only that he was a suicidal depressive who didn't care if other people died but when it came to Eric she used much more inflammatory language that he was the "homicidal psychopath" who wanted to kill. Dylan just went along with it.
But, in the end, Dylan was her son and she's going to speak of him, write of him, and remember him in the way that best serves herself and her own mental health. I did appreciate her insights, her memories, and her regrets even if I'm not convinced that she's entirely correct in everything she shared.
Graphic: Violence, Mass/school shootings, and Toxic friendship
Moderate: Death, Gun violence, and Murder
micasreads's review against another edition
4.0
Moderate: Child death, Gun violence, Mental illness, Suicidal thoughts, Suicide, Violence, Grief, Mass/school shootings, Murder, and Toxic friendship