You need to sign in or sign up before continuing.
Scan barcode
scfdavid's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
4.0
Graphic: Animal cruelty, Body horror, Child death, Cursing, Death, Gore, Blood, Excrement, Vomit, Grief, Car accident, and Murder
bgmylc's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
4.0
Graphic: Death, Gore, and Violence
Moderate: Child death and Suicide
akira_outofthegravity's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
4.0
Graphic: Body horror, Death, Suicide, Violence, Vomit, and Cannibalism
Moderate: Gore, Blood, and Grief
ricksilva's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
2.0
This was King's zombie apocalypse, The Stand cut down to a fourth the size and with much less appealing characters and a less conclusive ending.
Comic book artist Clayton Riddell is caught in the mayhem and sets off to make the trek from Boston to his home in Maine in the hope of discovering the fate of his son. He is joined by a small group of survivors, each having their own traumatic reaction to the sudden collapse of civilization.
Riddell himself was not all that appealing a character; flat in a lot of places, and at times unlikeable. His companions are generally better, although the brutal death of one of them at about 2/3 through the story felt like the author had just run out of ideas for that character's arc.
The zombie-like "phoners" become a bit more interesting as the book progresses, but a lot of their potential is lost in the ambiguous ending.
The cellphones turning people into zombies was clearly a bit of symbolism here, but it's a bluntly made point, and I was left wondering for how long after the publication of this, the note in the author's biography that he didn't own a cell phone remained true.
Graphic: Gore and Violence
Minor: Child death
btrz7's review against another edition
3.0
Graphic: Body horror, Child death, Death, Gore, Suicide, Blood, and Car accident
shelbywestc's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
2.75
Moderate: Body horror, Child death, Death, Gore, Self harm, Suicide, and Injury/Injury detail
aidenenjoysreading's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
3.75
Graphic: Death, Genocide, Gore, Suicide, Violence, Blood, and Pandemic/Epidemic
lilfox's review against another edition
Graphic: Animal cruelty and Gore
beccajay's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
3.25
Graphic: Animal cruelty, Animal death, Child death, Death, Genocide, Gore, Gun violence, Suicide, Violence, Blood, Car accident, Death of parent, Murder, War, and Injury/Injury detail
mothmami's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
3.5
Graphic: Gore, Suicide, Grief, Suicide attempt, Murder, War, and Injury/Injury detail