Scan barcode
wshier's review against another edition
3.0
The story is excruciating. But, since that is what the autor intended I suppose it makes this a "good" book. I would put it in the same category as Farewell to Arms...that is, not my favorite and not as good as say...The Sun Also Rises (for post war angst).
spencerrobb's review against another edition
2.0
(a reluctant 2.5) maybe it’s because this is the third fitzgerald book in a row i’ve read for class or maybe due to its absolute lack of plot and sole focus on style but i. did not vibe.
skimmed most of it
skimmed most of it
xanthreads's review against another edition
hopeful
relaxing
sad
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.0
Plot was good, some characters I disliked but all characters had flaws that made them life like. Good classic novel would probably read again.
lynniethepoohbear's review against another edition
dark
reflective
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
2.75
chelseanoack's review against another edition
3.0
Finally finished half a century later due to my crazy semester. I suppose I forgot about Fitzgerald's writing. I came from a year's worth of Murakami and Foster Wallace, both men filled with either dreamy rhetoric or ridiculously overbearing rhetoric, to Fitzgerald, who I find kind of slow and nonchalant. I gained a bias from how jarred I was coming from those two authors to an author I only read in high school English classes.
I told all my friends and coworkers how Fitzgerald is sexist, annoying, materialistic, etc. Granted, the guy wrote much of his books about the dramas between uncomfortably wealthy people with serious mental issues. However, by the last 150 pages I finally remembered what reading Fitzgerald is like. You have to stop only reading the petty dialogue and instead regard how the author formulates the sentences; it was a skill I COMPLETELY forgot about since high school English. Probably because when you're reading for leisure it's not natural?
Also, watching the main character fall into his alcoholism, like Fitzgerald did during the time he wrote the book, while the other main character steeped into her mental illness, like his wife Zelda did during the time he wrote it, was powerful enough for me. The end of the book had a string of poignant sentences that Foster Wallace tries to deliver in every page. That was nice to end the book on.
I give 3 stars because it's not the best book I've ever read. But, I appreciate how amazingly tough and strong-headed Fitzgerald was to write this. I can understand why this would be a favorite book for others. I guess just not for me.
I told all my friends and coworkers how Fitzgerald is sexist, annoying, materialistic, etc. Granted, the guy wrote much of his books about the dramas between uncomfortably wealthy people with serious mental issues. However, by the last 150 pages I finally remembered what reading Fitzgerald is like. You have to stop only reading the petty dialogue and instead regard how the author formulates the sentences; it was a skill I COMPLETELY forgot about since high school English. Probably because when you're reading for leisure it's not natural?
Also, watching the main character fall into his alcoholism, like Fitzgerald did during the time he wrote the book, while the other main character steeped into her mental illness, like his wife Zelda did during the time he wrote it, was powerful enough for me. The end of the book had a string of poignant sentences that Foster Wallace tries to deliver in every page. That was nice to end the book on.
I give 3 stars because it's not the best book I've ever read. But, I appreciate how amazingly tough and strong-headed Fitzgerald was to write this. I can understand why this would be a favorite book for others. I guess just not for me.
laurenbachman7's review against another edition
The fact that I don't remember a single thing from this book a year after reading it is enough to tell me that I did not care for it. What I remember is that it was relatively dull, seemed to drag on forever, and I did not see any moral in tow. Perhaps it will be worth revisiting when I'm older and have more time for analysis (particularly to investigate parallels between Fitzgerald's life and the story) in order for a proper review to be written.
cameronius's review against another edition
4.0
This is Fitzgerald's best, I think. The story starts slow but reaches a fever pitch near the end with some of the sharpest prose I've read closing out the final chapters. These characters were written by someone who was walked through the darkness. And like Kerouac's Big Sur, this one was written at the end for Fitzgerald while he (and his wife) deteriorated.
pollylollies's review against another edition
emotional
reflective
sad
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.0
chglein's review against another edition
3.0
The middle 1/3rd is fantastic--the rest, not so much. Hard to judge.