Take a photo of a barcode or cover
nezzzzzzzie's review against another edition
dark
funny
informative
inspiring
reflective
fast-paced
4.0
desertjarhead505's review against another edition
5.0
Excellent! Dr. Dutton examines the phenomenon of the psychopathic personality from every angle, positive and negative, and makes the resulting study lively, fascinating, and serious but also often funny. He explores the latest science at the time of writing (2009) seeking explanations of how and why some people are psychopaths, how they think and behave, and even undergoes an experimental procedure with a trancranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) machine - one I'd love to try too - to have his own brain very temporarily rendered psychopathic, so he can experience and report first-hand on what it's like to live inside such a mind.
He also looks at the presence, sometimes merely useful and sometimes absolutely essential, of some but not all of the traits of a psychopath in the people who are the very best in a number of professions and ways of life ranging from politicians and lawyers through law enforcement and special forces personnel to advanced Buddhist monks (something that was unsettling to a Buddhist friend and meditation instructor when I told her about it.) He also examines the question of whether our culture as a whole is becoming more psychopathic (it seems that it is), why, and what implications that has for the future.
Definitely a must-read for anyone interested in psychology, crime and the law, brain science, and trends in Western society.
He also looks at the presence, sometimes merely useful and sometimes absolutely essential, of some but not all of the traits of a psychopath in the people who are the very best in a number of professions and ways of life ranging from politicians and lawyers through law enforcement and special forces personnel to advanced Buddhist monks (something that was unsettling to a Buddhist friend and meditation instructor when I told her about it.) He also examines the question of whether our culture as a whole is becoming more psychopathic (it seems that it is), why, and what implications that has for the future.
Definitely a must-read for anyone interested in psychology, crime and the law, brain science, and trends in Western society.
polanabear's review against another edition
2.0
The insight to noise ratio doesn't fall it make this book worth it. There isn't any significant deliverance on how exactly psychopathic traits help in business other than platitudes we've all heard before. The author's writing style is pretty grating and makes for painful reading. Overall this is not worth the read for the low signal to noise ratio
ayahefnawy5's review against another edition
3.0
a fun and informative book. would definetely recommend it. i really liked how the book explained the positive side of psychopathic traits, what we can learn from psycopaths as well as how these traits are needed in alot of jobs to be succesful. the book also clarified how having psychopathic traits doesnt necessarily mean becoming a serial killer.
mroogieboogie's review against another edition
dark
informative
reflective
medium-paced
4.5
Useful viewpoints on how some people paint the world around them. And they mostly ignore (or simply can't see) the impact they make around others, just what gets things done for them.
yasisami's review against another edition
informative
medium-paced
3.75
overall, i found this book to be incredibly interesting. as a neuroscientist, i really enjoyed reading about the various studies performed to elucidate the differences between the average brain versus those of psychopaths, alongside the investigations of similarities between monks and psychopaths in certain paradigms—a parallel that many would hesitate to make. i found the parallels between potential potential psychopathy and saints intriguing (notably, however, the section on saint paul was present in my digital copy of the book but missing in my physical copy…).
the book does well to explain why psychopathic traits are not more prevalent than they already are, despite the inherent promiscuity (and thus, passing down of genetics) that psychopaths have. this is done by “saints”, “tit for tat”, and “shysters” as an example to explain why the prevalence of psychopathy remains relatively low in the human population yet is not completely squandered. an equilibrium must be reached—if too many ruthless people exist, they’ll extinguish each other, but a ruthless person versus a typical person… well, the more ruthless individual tends to win out.
further, the portion in which he speaks with the people at broad moor was enlightening. i wish there was more information on them, a deeper interview! i’d find that very insightful.
also, the hypothesis that psychopaths aren’t incapable of fear, so to speak, but instead don’t notice it due to ‘tunnel vision’ when it comes to a reward—thus functioning to filter fear out—is fascinating! this, in combination with the MAOA variant that causes lower than average levels, makes me want to bridge connections between some aspects of psychopathy and it being an issue of cognition and attention. the importance in dopamine (and perhaps monoamines in general) in other attentional disorders, add being a prime example, is well-established. i think an investigation into the effects of monoamines in psychopathy affecting attention in another manner is something that i definitely will be looking into further.
i think that it was also interesting how psychopathic traits were framed as necessary in times when one should break the mold. the author touches on the dangers of groupthink, and how lacking the traits that cause one to rebel against the herd mentality can actually exacerbate issues in group decision making. he also speaks on ‘cold’ versus ‘hot’ empathy, and how each is helpful under different circumstances.
that being said, while he does point out some positives of certain psychopathic traits, the explanation on how to harness them is lacking. the title implies that we’ll be taught how to use these traits in order for us (the reader) to be successful, but feasible steps aren’t given in order to put this belief into action. i didn’t mind too much bc that wasn’t my goal when reading, i was actually much more curious about the neuroscience and sociology aspects of psychopathy, but i see why it could be disappointing to others who pick up the book.
with the emphasis on how these traits aren’t necessarily married to violence, i found that there was less stress than i expected on how psychopaths function day-to-day when they aren’t blatantly ruffling society’s feathers. he touches on it when it comes to his childhood friend johnny, but i would’ve enjoyed more information on these types of interpersonal relationships, beyond the general overview that they tend to be more ruthless, calculating, and self-serving. he says psychopaths tend to be drifters, but does not speak on how this affects relationships for the ones that are exceptions to the rule. i’m certain he has more insight on this subject—after all, his own father was a psychopath! what could the benefits be to maintaining a relationship to a less migratory psychopath? he remains friends with johnny and states:
”you may be wondering why on earth i’ve remained friends with johnny […] one of johnny’s [saving graces] is his uncanny ability to turn virtually any situation to his own advantage.”
this is, frankly, not a convincing argument as to why he’d sustain this friendship. so, johnny is gifted in twisting situations to benefit himself—yeah, and? where does that leave you, johnny’s friend? he should’ve elaborated on the intricacies of relationships with psychopaths and what positives could come from this, since he seems to believe there must be some sort of gain in order to maintain these relationships. (i am realizing as i write this how ironic it is for me to imply that relationships are not to be maintained if they don’t grant you any favors—but really, what i value in my friendships requires some level of altruism that this population doesn’t seem to have. if i were to be friends with johnny, i’d be a disquieted caesar waiting for my brutus to stab me in the back.)
there was a mention of college kids nowadays being 40% less empathetic than their predecessors; i want to look into this further, but it would be interesting to research this in the context of the ‘what-about-me’-ism combined with lack of media literacy and anti-intellectualism that seems to be pervading in this generation.
lastly, i couldn’t help but roll my eyes when police officers or the military were put on a pedestal as a ‘good’ use of psychopathic traits. um… acab.
agawilmot's review against another edition
3.0
“I’ve always maintained that if I wasn’t studying psychopaths in prison, I’d do so at the stock exchange,” he enthused. “Without doubt, there’s a greater proportion of psychopathic big hitters in the corporate world than there is in the general population. You’ll find them in any organization where your position and status afford you power and control over others, and the chance of material gain.”
His coauthor on the corporate psychopathy paper, New York industrial and organizational psychologist Paul Babiak, agrees.
“The psychopath has no difficulty dealing with the consequences of rapid change. In fact, he or she thrives on it,” he explains. “Organizational chaos provides both the necessary stimulation for psychopathic thrill seeking and sufficient cover for psychopathic manipulation and abusive behavior.”
Ironically, the rule-bending, risk-taking, thrill-seeking individuals who were responsible for tipping the world economy over the edge are precisely the same personalities who will come to the fore in the wreckage. Just like Frank Abagnale, they are the mice who fall into the cream, fight and fight, and churn that cream into butter.
***
The word “psychopath” carries with it certain unavoidable connotations: images of famous serial killers, like Ted Bundy or Henry Lee Lucas and the almost mythic stories surrounding their individual reigns of terror; thoughts of men and women filled with uncontrollable, malevolent thoughts, in many cases acting on them to the harm and detriment of others. More and more, however, the term is finding application in more readily acceptable spheres—politics and the financial markets, to name a couple of quick and obvious examples, where making a killing, as nefarious as it sounds, is a far more benign proposition than its literal alternative. Even more interesting are the misnomers surrounding genuine psychopathy and what it truly means to be psychotic—and what such personality traits mean for the probability of success.
In his new book, The Wisdom of Psychopaths: What Saints, Spies, and Serial Killers Can Teach Us About Success, University of Cambridge professor of social psychology Dr. Kevin Dutton deep dives the psychopathic mind in order to strip away some of the more notorious preconceptions that have dogged psychopaths for generations, and in the process to offer a better understanding of their particular, often feared psychologies.
There’s an adaptive nature to psychopaths not accurately shown in most public portrayals. It isn’t rooted in amorality or malicious intent, but in an emotional fearlessness that, when balanced with an awareness of social expectations and/or knowledge or passion towards socially acceptable ventures or professions, gives psychopaths a noticeable leg-up. On the outside this can be represented by an unconventionally high degree of personal magnetism, or confidence, or the ability to disguise oneself—to play to the crowd, so to speak, no matter the attributes of said crowd; or maybe it reveals itself as uncanny business acumen, or willingness to go into battle regardless of whether or not the odds of survival are low. The point Dutton makes is that contrary to popular belief, there are uses—indeed necessities—for a mind more prone to stereotypically psychopathic traits, especially when presented with situations where emotional vulnerabilities are potentially grave liabilities.
The portraits of psychopaths Dutton paints are not the Patrick Bateman/Hannibal Lecture-style geniuses whose penchant for murder is well hidden beneath their business and academic minds. Those certainly exist and should be feared; however, most cases of psychopathy can be presented, as strange as this might sound, as being of exquisitely analytical and sound mind:
“Language, for psychopaths, is only word deep. There’s no emotional contouring behind it. A psychopath may say something like ‘I love you,’ but in reality, it means about as much to him as if he said ‘I’ll have a cup of coffee.’… This is one of the reasons why psychopaths remain so cool, calm, and collected under conditions of extreme danger, and why they are so reward-driven and take risks. Their brains, quite literally, are less ‘switched on’ than the rest of ours.”
Because of this, a psychopathic mind (providing it does not sway too far to one extreme or the other) can be expertly employed in situations requiring planning or some sort of conflict resolution.
So what can psychopaths teach us? That, for the most part, our problems—our fears and apprehensions that cripple us daily, or cause us to procrastinate and not live our lives to the potential we so desperately want to believe is inside each of us—are problems of the heart, and that it is how we are tuned to our emotions, and the degree to which they dominate our doubts, that exemplifies our collective weaknesses. Does this mean a balanced, socially integrated functional psychopath has an advantage over the average man, woman, and hopefully non-psychopathic child? It depends on the situation: when playing the stock market, most assuredly, as one cannot ever let one’s emotions be rattled by a loss—therein lies financial death and a quick shuttling to the side for this guy over here with his sleeves rolled up to his elbows and a willingness to take a beating one day and come back swinging hard the next; but when, say, teaching a class in an elementary or high school setting, not likely, as the inability to sync with individuals who are by and large emotional lightning rods could be potentially exhausting for all parties involved.
A psychopath is not necessarily a killer, or a heartless machine capable of only taking advantage of others, as we’re so frequently instructed to believe (given the rampant overuse and abuse of the term). That stereotype exists for a reason, as it is sometimes accurate; but, as with all points on the psychological spectrum, there are an infinite number of shades of grey that can be used to better define psychopathy to individual standards. Dutton’s examination goes a fair distance in disproving the concreteness of the stereotype, while opening the conversation to new possibilities as to how we see our business and political leaders, and even our more successful surgeons, spies, and military personnel. These professions, and many others, cater to a certain degree of psychopathy, which can often be mistaken for simply luck or confidence, but is in fact a much more complicated matter, one contained within the physiology of a surprisingly large amount of the population.
His coauthor on the corporate psychopathy paper, New York industrial and organizational psychologist Paul Babiak, agrees.
“The psychopath has no difficulty dealing with the consequences of rapid change. In fact, he or she thrives on it,” he explains. “Organizational chaos provides both the necessary stimulation for psychopathic thrill seeking and sufficient cover for psychopathic manipulation and abusive behavior.”
Ironically, the rule-bending, risk-taking, thrill-seeking individuals who were responsible for tipping the world economy over the edge are precisely the same personalities who will come to the fore in the wreckage. Just like Frank Abagnale, they are the mice who fall into the cream, fight and fight, and churn that cream into butter.
***
The word “psychopath” carries with it certain unavoidable connotations: images of famous serial killers, like Ted Bundy or Henry Lee Lucas and the almost mythic stories surrounding their individual reigns of terror; thoughts of men and women filled with uncontrollable, malevolent thoughts, in many cases acting on them to the harm and detriment of others. More and more, however, the term is finding application in more readily acceptable spheres—politics and the financial markets, to name a couple of quick and obvious examples, where making a killing, as nefarious as it sounds, is a far more benign proposition than its literal alternative. Even more interesting are the misnomers surrounding genuine psychopathy and what it truly means to be psychotic—and what such personality traits mean for the probability of success.
In his new book, The Wisdom of Psychopaths: What Saints, Spies, and Serial Killers Can Teach Us About Success, University of Cambridge professor of social psychology Dr. Kevin Dutton deep dives the psychopathic mind in order to strip away some of the more notorious preconceptions that have dogged psychopaths for generations, and in the process to offer a better understanding of their particular, often feared psychologies.
There’s an adaptive nature to psychopaths not accurately shown in most public portrayals. It isn’t rooted in amorality or malicious intent, but in an emotional fearlessness that, when balanced with an awareness of social expectations and/or knowledge or passion towards socially acceptable ventures or professions, gives psychopaths a noticeable leg-up. On the outside this can be represented by an unconventionally high degree of personal magnetism, or confidence, or the ability to disguise oneself—to play to the crowd, so to speak, no matter the attributes of said crowd; or maybe it reveals itself as uncanny business acumen, or willingness to go into battle regardless of whether or not the odds of survival are low. The point Dutton makes is that contrary to popular belief, there are uses—indeed necessities—for a mind more prone to stereotypically psychopathic traits, especially when presented with situations where emotional vulnerabilities are potentially grave liabilities.
The portraits of psychopaths Dutton paints are not the Patrick Bateman/Hannibal Lecture-style geniuses whose penchant for murder is well hidden beneath their business and academic minds. Those certainly exist and should be feared; however, most cases of psychopathy can be presented, as strange as this might sound, as being of exquisitely analytical and sound mind:
“Language, for psychopaths, is only word deep. There’s no emotional contouring behind it. A psychopath may say something like ‘I love you,’ but in reality, it means about as much to him as if he said ‘I’ll have a cup of coffee.’… This is one of the reasons why psychopaths remain so cool, calm, and collected under conditions of extreme danger, and why they are so reward-driven and take risks. Their brains, quite literally, are less ‘switched on’ than the rest of ours.”
Because of this, a psychopathic mind (providing it does not sway too far to one extreme or the other) can be expertly employed in situations requiring planning or some sort of conflict resolution.
So what can psychopaths teach us? That, for the most part, our problems—our fears and apprehensions that cripple us daily, or cause us to procrastinate and not live our lives to the potential we so desperately want to believe is inside each of us—are problems of the heart, and that it is how we are tuned to our emotions, and the degree to which they dominate our doubts, that exemplifies our collective weaknesses. Does this mean a balanced, socially integrated functional psychopath has an advantage over the average man, woman, and hopefully non-psychopathic child? It depends on the situation: when playing the stock market, most assuredly, as one cannot ever let one’s emotions be rattled by a loss—therein lies financial death and a quick shuttling to the side for this guy over here with his sleeves rolled up to his elbows and a willingness to take a beating one day and come back swinging hard the next; but when, say, teaching a class in an elementary or high school setting, not likely, as the inability to sync with individuals who are by and large emotional lightning rods could be potentially exhausting for all parties involved.
A psychopath is not necessarily a killer, or a heartless machine capable of only taking advantage of others, as we’re so frequently instructed to believe (given the rampant overuse and abuse of the term). That stereotype exists for a reason, as it is sometimes accurate; but, as with all points on the psychological spectrum, there are an infinite number of shades of grey that can be used to better define psychopathy to individual standards. Dutton’s examination goes a fair distance in disproving the concreteness of the stereotype, while opening the conversation to new possibilities as to how we see our business and political leaders, and even our more successful surgeons, spies, and military personnel. These professions, and many others, cater to a certain degree of psychopathy, which can often be mistaken for simply luck or confidence, but is in fact a much more complicated matter, one contained within the physiology of a surprisingly large amount of the population.
elanalewis's review against another edition
3.0
So this is a fun little book! With enough psychology language paired with practical application to make it easier to conceptually understand for the mainstream reader.
I learned I am on the cusp. I need to become just a tad more psychopathic to push through my anxiety/depression associated with empathetic tendencies. ;)
I learned I am on the cusp. I need to become just a tad more psychopathic to push through my anxiety/depression associated with empathetic tendencies. ;)