Scan barcode
toddbert's review against another edition
emotional
reflective
sad
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
5.0
joannaautumn's review against another edition
5.0
Words can’t describe how much this book made an impact on me, but I will try to articulate it as much as I can.
At first glance, The Years may seem like a classical family saga, but in fact, is anything but. This novel comes close to what an anti-family novel would be: it’s a social critic of not only the Pargiters but the suffocating grip of patriarchy on people of the time. It’s in the tradition of hiding emotional dissatisfaction and masking it with composure, the light shines on the cracks, blurs, and smears of the Pargiters’ hypocrisy, it’s in the generational trauma and misconceptions that are passed down into the next generation, even the likable characters suffer from xenophobia and anti-Semitism inherited from their ancestors(Sara, for example)
A technique characteristical for The Years is the reoccurrence of patterns and repetitive actions, a sudden awareness of oneself as two beings at the same time, an observer and a participant in life (where am I? where am I going? Are the questions the female characters ask themselves throughout the novel).
The central character, Eleanor is in constant search of sense behind the patterns, until she comes to the realization that there is no sense behind them, it will always be out of reach, one should accept that fact in order to live fully in the current time.
The character and social study in The Years is one of the sharpest and cleanest ones I have seen Virginia do, besides in the more famous The Waves and Mrs. Dalloway, this is her most qualitative work. She expresses a wide array of emotions in the character, brilliantly paints a picture of people who are afraid of being themselves, of outside judgment that separates them, the covert and unsurpassed trauma of war, the difference between private I and public I, the repression of emotions, the omnipotence of a father figure, imposed heterosexuality, the generational gap, class, and national differences, stagnation, silence.
The tone, the humanistic under-layer of compassion, and the thoughts of these characters all hit close to home, I cried multiple times while reading this book, I don’t remember the last time something hit me this hard ever since I read Franny and Zooey in 2020, Virginia continues to surprise me with her intellect and skill; I remember reading her statement after reading Proust’s In Search of lost time, and I repeat it as a statement true to me after reading her work The Years: What else is there to write about?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Officially my third favorite Woolf novel after The Waves and Mrs. Dalloway.
“There must be another life, she thought, sinking back into her chair, exasperated. Not in dreams; but here and now, in this room, with living people. She felt as if she were standing on the edge of a precipice with her hair blown back; she was about to grasp something that just evaded her. There must be another life, here and now, she repeated. This is too short, too broken. We know nothing, even about ourselves.”
At first glance, The Years may seem like a classical family saga, but in fact, is anything but. This novel comes close to what an anti-family novel would be: it’s a social critic of not only the Pargiters but the suffocating grip of patriarchy on people of the time. It’s in the tradition of hiding emotional dissatisfaction and masking it with composure, the light shines on the cracks, blurs, and smears of the Pargiters’ hypocrisy, it’s in the generational trauma and misconceptions that are passed down into the next generation, even the likable characters suffer from xenophobia and anti-Semitism inherited from their ancestors(Sara, for example)
”It was an abominable system, he thought; family life; Abercorn Terrace. No wonder the house would not let. It had one bathroom, and a basement; and there all those different people had lived, boxed up together, telling lies.”
A technique characteristical for The Years is the reoccurrence of patterns and repetitive actions, a sudden awareness of oneself as two beings at the same time, an observer and a participant in life (where am I? where am I going? Are the questions the female characters ask themselves throughout the novel).
The central character, Eleanor is in constant search of sense behind the patterns, until she comes to the realization that there is no sense behind them, it will always be out of reach, one should accept that fact in order to live fully in the current time.
“Her feeling of happiness returned to her, her unreasonable exaltation. It seemed to her that they were all young, with the future before them. Nothing was fixed; nothing was known; life was open and free before them.
“Isn’t that odd?” she exclaimed. “Isn’t that queer? Isn’t that why life’s a perpetual—what shall I call it?—miracle? … I mean,” she tried to explain, for he looked puzzled, “old age they say is like this; but it isn’t. It’s different; quite different. So when I was a child; so when I was a girl; it’s been a perpetual discovery, my life. A miracle.”
The character and social study in The Years is one of the sharpest and cleanest ones I have seen Virginia do, besides in the more famous The Waves and Mrs. Dalloway, this is her most qualitative work. She expresses a wide array of emotions in the character, brilliantly paints a picture of people who are afraid of being themselves, of outside judgment that separates them, the covert and unsurpassed trauma of war, the difference between private I and public I, the repression of emotions, the omnipotence of a father figure, imposed heterosexuality, the generational gap, class, and national differences, stagnation, silence.
“He can’t say what he wants to say; he’s afraid. They’re all afraid; afraid of being laughed at; afraid of giving themselves away. He’s afraid too, he thought, looking at the young man with a fine forehead and a weak chin who was gesticulating, too emphatically. We’re all afraid of each other, he thought; afraid of what? Of criticism; of laughter; of people who think differently…. He’s afraid of me because I’m a farmer (and he saw again his round face; high cheekbones and small brown eyes). And I’m afraid of him because he’s clever. He looked at the big forehead, from which the hair was already receding. That’s what separates us; fear, he thought.”
The tone, the humanistic under-layer of compassion, and the thoughts of these characters all hit close to home, I cried multiple times while reading this book, I don’t remember the last time something hit me this hard ever since I read Franny and Zooey in 2020, Virginia continues to surprise me with her intellect and skill; I remember reading her statement after reading Proust’s In Search of lost time, and I repeat it as a statement true to me after reading her work The Years: What else is there to write about?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Officially my third favorite Woolf novel after The Waves and Mrs. Dalloway.
sanjastajdohar's review against another edition
4.0
The penultimate Woolf's novel is much less experimental than I would have expected before reading and it was somewhat easier to follow, especially due to the time markings in the story. Following the Pargiter family throughout the years (pun intended), mainly the end of the 19th and the first third of the 20th century, you get a glimpse of the family life and of individual inner workings of most (but not all) family members and their posterity. You also get a sense of a change of times the impact of WWI and changing politics (though not mentioned as much as one would expect for this time period) and the change in the upper society norms and family gatherings. For me, Elisabeth's transformation (the eldest daughter)' was the most interesting, but not many of the characters were captivating enough to distinguish themselves. The short vignettes of everyday life throughout the decades really painted an interesting picture of life in Britain, but it is like an unfinished puzzle with a lot of pieces missing that you, as a reader, have to fill in. Which I actually like. What reduced the rating for me was the occasional antisemitism and racism, which, even if we take it into account as a product of its time, served no purpose whatsoever and could well have been excluded without the damage to the story or characterization. Also, getting to know less characters, but to know them better is more to my taste. But, as in all Woolf's novels I've read so far, the sentences are beautiful and musings on life, nature and society powerful and effective.
bosquedemel's review against another edition
5.0
Lovely and masterful. At first it took me a while to get into, due to the small shifting povs, but then the sections got larger and it became easier to follow. In fact, the first time I enjoyed reading the book was when the pov changed to Edward and Kitty's time at Oxford, a longer, more defined, section. However, the moment I really fell in love with the novel was the long chapter about Sara and Martin's day in London - it's absolutely lovely, and Sara is a brilliant character. The book is just filled with great passages and a dreamy atmosphere which, coupled with Woolf's writing - an amazingly hypnotic one that rises and falls like a melody - completely grabs you and draws you in.
rosecontreras's review against another edition
reflective
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
3.0
The sun had risen, and the sky above the houses wore an air of extraordinary beauty, simplicity and peace.
autumnreads_'s review against another edition
emotional
hopeful
reflective
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
annaelisaa's review against another edition
emotional
reflective
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
2.0