Reviews

A Perfect Match by Jill McGown

willowcat's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

Enjoyable detective story with two interesting lead detectives. Good first book in what looks like it could be a series worth reading. Downside of very poor formatting for kindle making it difficult to follow in parts.

bethjohnson7's review

Go to review page

Slow start- didn’t feel worth reading 

amelia_shakes's review

Go to review page

mysterious reflective tense slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

2.75

nocto's review

Go to review page

Small, but pretty well formed. I liked the look of a couple of the later books in the Lloyd & Hill series but received advice that the character development was such that it was a series worth making the effort to read in order so I've started at the first book.

There's a good plot, nothing too deep or complicated, just enough complexity for a two hundred page book in fact. You don't feel like things are being dragged out or too much is being squeezed into the last few pages. I like both the main police characters and am looking forward to seeing where McGown takes then. All in all a good start to a series.

lauraellis's review

Go to review page

3.0

A pleasant British copper mystery, set in a small town, where a police inspector and his female come to investigate a murder and fall in love.  Pleasant and enjoyable, although not particularly memorable or unusual.  The series is worth pursuing.

indywonder05's review

Go to review page

1.0

I read a Lloyd and Hill mystery previously and liked it. It is a good thing I did not read this one first or else I would have probably not read another. One of my biggest complaints with mysteries is when the author lets you get inside the head of the murder but you - the reader - don't know it. It seems to me when that happens the author is using a cheap trick to confuse the reader. Give me the facts. Tell me the story and if I guess who did it, well then dear author you did not do you job. Or maybe you did if that was your intent, the point is when I get a glimps inside the private thoughts of characters I don't want to see surprise and questions and impulse reactions when the person is the murderer and knows very well what happened and WHY. Bothers me. Up until the moment I realized I had been deceived I liked it okay. I may have given it two stars. Maybe. One other thing I don't like is when animals narrate. The duck should have been interviewed? or was it a bunny? She finished almost every chapter with trees or animals or something 'thinking' if only the police would interview me or something. I thought it was distracting. I still may read another Lloyd and Hill because I did like the other one I read and perhaps it just gets better, it couldn't get worse.

audreyintheheadphones's review

Go to review page

2.0

*blows whistle*

"We have a flag on the play: illegal addition of a murder suspect twenty pages from the end, who proves to be instrumental in whodunnit." *crosses arms, points*

"Goodwill box penalty, never again." *gestures vaguely thrift store-wards*