You need to sign in or sign up before continuing.
Scan barcode
harlando's review against another edition
3.0
I enjoyed this. It was highlights from the Freakanomics blog, so it lacks a continuous theme, but that also made it a good book for short bursts of reading.
crazylady_usmc's review against another edition
funny
informative
inspiring
lighthearted
reflective
medium-paced
4.25
lmkramer507's review against another edition
3.0
If you like the Freakonomics books, you'll probably enjoy this. It's a sampling of blog posts from the Freakonomics blog, so if you follow the blog, you can probably skip the book. The posts are short, so it's an easy read if you're going to be interrupted frequently. Not as gripping as the other Freakonomics books, however.
spamrisk's review against another edition
4.0
A brief overview
Of interesting subjects.
Could use a deep dive.
Of interesting subjects.
Could use a deep dive.
clever_cugel's review against another edition
3.0
Compilation of short interesting articles from their blog. If you like Freakonomics, you'll find it entertaining. Good bathroom reader or book to fill in small slots of free time without a big investment of attention.
holly_keimig's review against another edition
2.0
The title of this book caught my eye on one of those days when I was feeling poor. It was an interesting read but nothing too new. It is a collection of blog posts that they made, so its like reading only the blog with no funny comments to break things up. I learned a few new things but it was nowhere near as entertaining as Freakonomics was for me.
samstillreading's review against another edition
4.0
I should probably credit the Freakonomics team with partially leading me to studying economics. Of course, I could also blame them for the opportunity cost of having less money (paying for university fees) and less leisure time (because I was studying). But weirdly enough, I did gain utility throughout it all, including reading this collection of their blog posts. If you’ve read these online, you could be familiar with a few but I’m really bad at catching up with blog posts so the time and money investment was worth it.
The main difference with When to Rob a Bank (spoiler: it’s not when you would think) is that the topics and posts are shorter. This can be great if you’ve got five minutes to read, but occasionally disappointing if you want to know lots more. Fortunately, there is a collection of references at the back to look into your favourite topics. The shorter posts are also useful if you just want to know the simple answer (like why kiwifruit are really cheap in the US). The book is organised into chapters with a loose link between them all, but I thought the best chapter was the collection of posts that didn’t fit under any other titles. I read this midweek and I found the format worked in well with ad breaks, reading during boring news segments etc. Also, if you aren’t particularly interested in a subject, you can skip or skim it, without feeling that you’ve missed out. Some of the topics aren’t as well thought out as others, but as they are short, I don’t think they need to be. Sometimes they are more of a story than a lesson in economics and that’s OK too. Maybe one of them will spark off an idea for a great study on that topic.
If you want your Freakonomics to be in-depth, I’d recommend the earlier books. For shorter musings, this is your book. Either way, all are easy to read with interesting observations on the mundane to the odd.
http://samstillreading.wordpress.com
The main difference with When to Rob a Bank (spoiler: it’s not when you would think) is that the topics and posts are shorter. This can be great if you’ve got five minutes to read, but occasionally disappointing if you want to know lots more. Fortunately, there is a collection of references at the back to look into your favourite topics. The shorter posts are also useful if you just want to know the simple answer (like why kiwifruit are really cheap in the US). The book is organised into chapters with a loose link between them all, but I thought the best chapter was the collection of posts that didn’t fit under any other titles. I read this midweek and I found the format worked in well with ad breaks, reading during boring news segments etc. Also, if you aren’t particularly interested in a subject, you can skip or skim it, without feeling that you’ve missed out. Some of the topics aren’t as well thought out as others, but as they are short, I don’t think they need to be. Sometimes they are more of a story than a lesson in economics and that’s OK too. Maybe one of them will spark off an idea for a great study on that topic.
If you want your Freakonomics to be in-depth, I’d recommend the earlier books. For shorter musings, this is your book. Either way, all are easy to read with interesting observations on the mundane to the odd.
http://samstillreading.wordpress.com