Reviews

Dancing Girls and Other Stories by Margaret Atwood

m_____artha's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.5

It is difficult to describe this book as each story doesn't really fit neatly into place with the others. Where some collections of short stories have overarching themes in common, repeated motifs and even recurring characters, reading from story to story seemed more like a broken stream of consciousness. Atwood wrote them at different stages of her life and career, and I think we should consider this book by its parts rather than its whole effect. Recently, I have realised that the reason why everyone seems to remember or like different stories from a collection like this is because they are so personal. I found I could relate to some with such an intensity that I don't think I'll ever forget them and others seemed alien to me; like looking through someone else's eyes and realising you are a different height, distracted by the differences rather than the story itself. 

Nevertheless, I will note down the short stories that I found the most memorable (this is my review after all).

My favourite was Giving Birth, the last short story as it had an interesting commentary on language we have assigned to the act of 'giving birth'. Here Atwood questions what it is to give birth, who is giving, who is receiving... and I loved it. I thought it was very clever, particularly by posing these questions through the slightly defracted lens of the main character and the shadow women that follows her during her birth. 

Some stories I found strange like ' Polarities ' while others I found brilliantly weird ('Hair Jewellery'). It really is subjective but if you, reader, are planning on reading this. I would advise you to go in with an open mind, forget the negative reviews around this one and make up your own mind. 

carlylottsofbookz's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

I was nervous to read this book. I LOVE Atwood's novels, and was terrified that I would not adore her short stories as much. Of course, I should have had faith: It's Margarat Atwood, I don't think she knows how to not write well.

What was interesting about these stories, most of which had female narrators, was how haunting and truthful they are. Even in these short stories Atwood is able to develop characters who are so ordinary that their faults are so truthful--and you can't help but to know that these things could happen.

tasharobinson's review against another edition

Go to review page

2.0

Normally I'm a huge fan of Margaret Atwood, but this early collection just felt like wading through mud for me. So many sketches of characters that go nowhere, stories that are just about a state of mind that never resolves into anything particularly telling, prose that isn't particularly interesting or lively. Her more recent work feels so much more ambitious, and deeply felt, and wise, than this. There are standouts in this collection, like the classic "Rape Fantasies," and "Training," but most of these stories were a bit of a chore for me.

emilyinherhead's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.5

My mother always said you shouldn’t dwell on unpleasant things and I generally agree with that, I mean, dwelling on them doesn’t make them go away. Though not dwelling on them doesn’t make them go away either, when you come to think of it. (100)

I was pleasantly surprised at how much I enjoyed this collection of stories. My favorite was probably “A Travel Piece.”

_stephanie_98's review against another edition

Go to review page

reflective fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.5

sarahrandall's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark medium-paced

3.5

dernichtraucherin's review against another edition

Go to review page

mysterious reflective medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.0

luweebayy's review against another edition

Go to review page

2.0

Maybe short stories aren’t for me unless they’re gothic horror stories. I just found myself thinking ‘what?!’ at the end of every single one of these. Even the one I started to like about the children’s camp, I was left like okay... so now what and then it cut off and moved to another story. Like too much and nothing happened all at the same time... not for me.

aralakh's review against another edition

Go to review page

  • Plot- or character-driven? N/A
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

2.25

juliep810's review against another edition

Go to review page

2.0

Reading this was slow and painful, it reaffirmed my 'unpopular' opinion that Atwood truly cannot write