Scan barcode
kathryneh's review against another edition
3.0
First sentence: Hen Miss Fox-Seton descended from the twopenny bus as it drew up, she gathered her trim tailor-maid skirt about her with neatness and decorum, being well used to getting in and out of twopenny buses and to making her way across muddy London streets.
This was an interesting story. The author wrote [b:The Secret Garden|2998|The Secret Garden|Frances Hodgson Burnett|https://d.gr-assets.com/books/1327873635s/2998.jpg|3186437], so I expected this story-line to be a bit more light-hearted. It had some quite dark places. I just knew the end had to be a happy one, which it was yet it still kept me guessing right up to the last few pages just exactly how this would all come to an end.
This was an interesting story. The author wrote [b:The Secret Garden|2998|The Secret Garden|Frances Hodgson Burnett|https://d.gr-assets.com/books/1327873635s/2998.jpg|3186437], so I expected this story-line to be a bit more light-hearted. It had some quite dark places. I just knew the end had to be a happy one, which it was yet it still kept me guessing right up to the last few pages just exactly how this would all come to an end.
elainegl's review against another edition
3.0
I didn't enjoy this book as much as I've enjoyed the books Burnett has written for children. I didn't think the writing was as good, nor the character development. Burnett tells us again and again what the various characters are like, but doesn't "show" us. I never really developed sympathy for Emily. And while the story was a good story overall, it could have been a much shorter book. I recommend this book if you're trying to read all that Burnett has written, but not if it's one of your only readings of her. A Little Princess, The Secret Garden, Little Lord Fauntleroy, and The Lost Prince are much better.
belleoftheb00ks's review against another edition
adventurous
lighthearted
fast-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
3.5
mrswythe89's review against another edition
Read on Gutenberg.net, with the vague idea that it would function as comfort reading. The first half did this fairly well, but the second half, holy racism, Batman!
I don't even know why I finished this. I think partly I persisted in the desperate hope that everyone's racism would be shown to be totally unfair and the Indian servant would NOT kill anyone and their suspicions of her would be shown to be wrong, but I don't even know why I was so stupid as to hope for that.
I don't even know why I finished this. I think partly I persisted in the desperate hope that everyone's racism would be shown to be totally unfair and the Indian servant would NOT kill anyone and their suspicions of her would be shown to be wrong, but I don't even know why I was so stupid as to hope for that.
olene_quinn's review against another edition
4.0
This book is a little hard to describe. It begins as a marriage of convenience romance. Then, that plot is set aside in favor of it becoming a gothic novel. The gothic novel plot gets tossed out the window in a deeply unsatisfying twist. The romance comes back to center stage and transitions from a prosaic, calm sort of love into a full blown Victorian melodrama. The last page returns to the gothic elements after a space of four years and suddenly sums them up in a paragraph or two. Characters are added and promptly forgotten throughout the narration. I understand that the strange pacing is probably due to the fact that this was originally published as two separate novellas which were later knit together.
And yet, there was something engrossing and charming about this novel. Emily, though frustratingly weak-willed and obtuse at times, was kind and loving enough to make up for it. Lord Walderhurst, a stuffy prig, somehow becomes lovable. Even Lady Maria, who had the audacity to insult a new born baby's appearance gets forgiven.
So, while I feel I should be rating this three stars, I am going to give it four simply because I was thoroughly entertained and truly liked the characters despite myself.
Content warning: This was originally published in 1901 and there is casual racism sprinkled throughout the middle of this book. A few passages are difficult to read.
And yet, there was something engrossing and charming about this novel. Emily, though frustratingly weak-willed and obtuse at times, was kind and loving enough to make up for it. Lord Walderhurst, a stuffy prig, somehow becomes lovable. Even Lady Maria, who had the audacity to insult a new born baby's appearance gets forgiven.
So, while I feel I should be rating this three stars, I am going to give it four simply because I was thoroughly entertained and truly liked the characters despite myself.
Content warning: This was originally published in 1901 and there is casual racism sprinkled throughout the middle of this book. A few passages are difficult to read.
lory_enterenchanted's review against another edition
2.5
Reviews and more on my blog, Entering the Enchanted Castle I started reading this because I couldn't sleep one night, and then I had to keep going to the end. An odd mixture of comedy of manners, thriller, melodrama, and sentimental romance, veering wildly through various emotional trajectories. I think it would have been more successful if it had stuck more to just one or two sorts of stories; as it is, we are just settling into one when we get taken off in another direction; just after the most gooey sentimental bit, we get a grim, cynical ending as a chaser. Maybe Burnett was making fun of her own genre-writing formulas somehow? Also, very class-conscious and snobby, but that's Burnett for you. In some ways reminiscent of a grown-up A Little Princess, but with a heroine who is much more ordinary than Sara, almost stupid, and notable mainly for her slavish devotion to the man who rescues her from a life of poverty. I remember being disappointed the first time I read it, and so it was again.
giddypony's review against another edition
3.0
often unintentionally hilarious. the two books are different in tone, the second reading like a vain attempt to be Wilkie Collins. the heroine is stupid. and it is thevirtue of this that leads to her good fortune. racist and classist, plus phrenology.