You need to sign in or sign up before continuing.

3.52 AVERAGE


If I could give this less than one star, I would. This book was an awful waste of time.

Picture this, you are an eight year old child and you have an adult imaginary friend of the opposite sex. When it is your ninth year birthday your imaginary friend tells you it’s time for him/her to go and that you won’t remember them tomorrow. Yet, you never forget your friend. One day you see him/her in your city when you’re an adult and the imaginary friend hasn’t changed one bit. Well this is what James Patterson and Gabrielle Charbonnet Sundays at Tiffany’s is all about.

Jane is now an adult working not only in the company her mother started, but also for an overbearing mother. Jane has successfully created a Broadway show called Thank Heaven which is based on her imaginary friend Michael whom she has never forgotten.

Michael has found himself in New York City waiting on his next assignment. Most of the children he has forgotten and there are some he never forgets. There’s only one he’s really loved and that’s Jane. As he strolls through the city he wonders if she is still here and what she is doing. He begins to seek her out and one day sees her strolling through the park. The next morning he returns to see where Jane works. When she gets to the company, Jane is met by her boyfriend Hugh. Michael then decides he has to let Jane go.

One day Jane is enjoying a coffee ice cream sundae at the Astor Court of the St. Regis Hotel. She glances up and thinks she see’s Michael her imaginary friend. As she walks over she is astonished that it is Michael and that he’s talking to another girl. Michael is real and not imaginary anymore. James Patterson and Gabrielle Charbonnet take the reader on a magnificent ride as Jane and Michael become more acquainted with each other and discovering why Michael is in human flesh and there in New York.

Sundays at Tiffany’s clearly blows James Patterson previous two books Sam’s Letters to Jennifer and Suzanne’s Diary for Nicholas out of the water.


Not the worst book I've ever read, but definitely not worth the time it took to get past the blurb inside the cover. If you read that, you can spare yourself the book, which was very poorly written and had an unbelievably trite plot.

I LOVED this book! it was so cute and unique! James Patterson is such a versatile writer and I enjoy his writing style. Such a great love story.
emotional mysterious fast-paced
Plot or Character Driven: Character
Strong character development: Yes
Loveable characters: Complicated
Diverse cast of characters: Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus: Yes

This was a good book I give it a 3.5 stars cuz I’d say I didn’t really love it so much but I didn’t dislike it either. It was a good story about a girl and her imaginary friend and how it’s a romance story between the two of them. There were some nice characters but there were also some characters that I did not like but that’s ok. I don’t know if I’d recommend it to people maybe if you like romance with a bit of mystery but if not then I wouldn’t bother. Besides from that it was a all good story 😊🩷

weird read.

One of the best James Patterson books I've read. It's not your typical action-packed fiery romance books that he usually writes, but rather an interesting story about an old childhood friendship that rekindles in adulthood (of course there's romance in there too now). This book made me ache to be back in NYC and I related well to it.

I read this 9 years ago and all I remember is I read it in a few hours at a hostel in San Diego before I went out for the night.

This is very different from the other books I have read from James Patterson. Very unexpected but sometimes the unexpected can turn out to be a good thing. I read the book in two evenings before bed so it definitely held my attention. Overall, it was a very nice read fun and heartwarming. The characters are warm and genuine. You will fall in love with Jane Michael and Vivienne!

It is not the type of book that I usually read, but I enjoyed it. It was a quick, easy, and entertaining read. I would probably give it more of a 3 1/2 than a four...