Take a photo of a barcode or cover
emiserable's review
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
4.5
Graphic: Child death, Death, and Fire/Fire injury
Moderate: Violence, Blood, Grief, Murder, and Colonisation
Minor: Toxic relationship and Xenophobia
isabelle_mary's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.0
Moderate: Death, Violence, and Fire/Fire injury
crml's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
2.75
i simply didnt connect to the writing style, the book over all didnt feel challeging, it didnt make me think, it was mostly pretty flat out and i felt it didnt leave room for the reader to try and deduct things on their own. the book also felt, for lack of a better description, pretty fan-fiction-y, in some parts more than others especially. i also felt that Ribays writing so often felt indecisive - like he doesnt know when some things are best left out, and this is even expressed in the fact that there are SO many lists?? i seriously couldnt ignore it because he was listing things left and right, it was so much that it was weird and legitimately bothering me. (a little ironic since rokus whole big flaw is being indecisive). Ribay even included a cut chapter in the soecia edition that i read, saying he had to cut it but still just wanted it to be included!
one thing i did like about the book is rokus character- or i liked that didnt like him. he'd been my least favorite avatar since before id read the book and id been looking forward to see if the book would make me like him or dislike him more - and i really like that they leaned in to his annoying-ness and punchable-ness. not to be a hater but hes so fucking stupid and i love when he gets humbled especially by gyatso.
im sure there are people who enjoyed this book and that’s completely valid, i just had high expectations and was disappointed.
Moderate: Violence, Murder, and Toxic friendship
Minor: Misogyny, Toxic relationship, and Xenophobia
ferlefur's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.0
Each new entry of the "Chronicles of the Avatar" series is lower in quality than it's predecessor, which wasn't much of a problem when we were at book 2 or 3. However, book 5 has little redeemable qualities.
Unlike Yee, Ribay was tasked with filling the gaps of the live of an avatar that we already know well: we know how his story begins and ends. I confess I was never particularly interested in knowing more about Roku, but I was still excited over this book. Yet, somehow, Ribay managed to turn Roku into an incredibly naive Avatar, who is unable to see how his *obviously evil friend* is evil.
Randy Ribay's writing style is too repetitive and shallow, and it really breaks the immersion. I also don't understand what's the point of jumping chapters/POV every 2 pages or so, it's distracting.
He insists on explaining things that no one asked explanations for: "Why does the fire nation say 'flamey-o' in Aang's timeline?":
The only good things to come out of this are Gyatso and Malaya. However, the latter
In short: Ribay's writing is shallow, and so are his characters. The pacing is terrible, and the story is nonsensical.
Moderate: Child death, Violence, and Fire/Fire injury
luciferlibrarian_93's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.75
Heck just give me a Gyatso-focused Avatar companion book and a Kyoshi movie and I’ll be just peachy. 👍
Moderate: Child death, Death, Violence, Blood, Grief, Murder, Fire/Fire injury, Toxic friendship, Colonisation, War, and Classism
fran_buesa's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.75
Graphic: Death, Violence, and Blood
libreroaming's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.25
That said, while this novel is good in many respects, it suffers from the worst kind of prequel-itis you can have. Where the author is more preoccupied with laying out foreshadowing for the better-known property than developing their own story. Roku is the Avatar we knew the most about from Aang's journey, and his tragic mistake of allowing a friend's ruthless ambition to continue unchecked is the shadow that haunts Aang's journey in Avatar: the Last Airbender. But this story is about a young Roku, just starting out, so he shouldn't be making that error so obviously and repeatedly from the start.
Having Roku and Sozin continue to interact during Roku's training already contradicts the canon in the episode of "The Avatar and the Fire Lord" but it also shows Ribay's biggest mistake in my opinion. He refuses to let the narrative make the choice of morally grey characters. Gyatso clocks Sozin as evil with first glance, newcomer Malaya tips us off with her mistrust of the clan leader Ulo in a way that makes everyone in their island seem dumber in comparison for not noticing it. And of course Malaya also makes the same assumption of Sozin to the point where she's determined to try and assassinate him withing five minutes of meeting him while they're both trying to rescue Roku.
Ulo was a perfect setup for a Jet like character who had extreme views but rooted in sound motives to protect. Instead he's characterized by the narrative repeatedly as untrustworthy and bad, which can be fine but makes the story feel more didactic than impactful. Sozin's big moment of choosing Roku over power momentarily feels weak since he could always just...go back to the library. The whole "it could sink by the time he gets back" has no urgency, especially since we know Zhao manages it a good 80 or so years later.
Overall, this is an okay fantasy story but not something I would give to someone to introduce them to Avatar the way I would with the Kyoshi stories. At the end of the plot, Roku's meddling made everything worse, and his spiritual growth feels stop-and-start with how oblivious he is to circumstances. I don't feel like I appreciate his character, Gyatso's, or Sozin's better for reading it. Instead, it's the opposite.
Graphic: Child death, Violence, and Fire/Fire injury
Moderate: Death and Colonisation
Minor: War
haleybre's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
5.0
Moderate: Child death, Death, Violence, Blood, Grief, Murder, Fire/Fire injury, Colonisation, Injury/Injury detail, and Classism