Scan barcode
nana_sillylilbooks's review against another edition
challenging
dark
funny
medium-paced
3.5
First 2/3 fantastic, funny, dark, clever… then it got TOO clever, and then a massive thing was revealed and the book ended 🙂 It just ended. In this very left field way.
Moderate: Physical abuse
_nayla_'s review against another edition
dark
sad
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
1.5
Mona tried to do something and it simply didn't work for me.
It wasn't just the hyper-sexual nature of every single person, or the long monologues that elite writers are apparently incapable of keeping behind their teeth, or even the weird mythological flood in the last . . . 10 pages? You know, all of this together is making me think I need to knock it down to 1 star. I may update.
I disliked the callous nature with which Oloixarac portrayed sexual violence. I disliked all of the drug and alcohol and sex talk; Mona was extremely unlikeable and base (masturbating on a plane? "Eating my sushi"? Please, give me a break). It was unsettling how much Mona sexualized violence against women as if it was something to be desired. I understand she was working through her trauma, but I was rolling my eyes the whole time.
If Oloixarac wanted to garner sympathy for South American POC women with this portrayal, she did a terrible job. The only person I felt sympathy for was Sunrita and she was only spoken of in passing. I would've played up "Mona" as a modern da Vinci muse: the lone, impassive figure who is complacent yet observant, always. A blank slate on which to project desire and intention. Tie it all back to what the writers are all doing in Sweden, somehow. I don't know man, I'm not the author! Pero dale, hermana, ponete las pilas.
The tie-in Oloixarac tried to create with the horrific violence Mona endured to that of Sunrita's gang rape and death left much to be desired. Frankly, the entire book was disjointed — likely exacerbated by Mona's liberal vape Valium use — and an unreliable narrator only works if the character is someone who we want to walk with during the story. I just wanted it to be over.
It's trauma, plain and simple, symbolized by final destruction. It could've worked and it didn't. Oh well, on to the next!
Overall: it insists upon itself.
It wasn't just the hyper-sexual nature of every single person, or the long monologues that elite writers are apparently incapable of keeping behind their teeth, or even the weird mythological flood in the last . . . 10 pages? You know, all of this together is making me think I need to knock it down to 1 star. I may update.
I disliked the callous nature with which Oloixarac portrayed sexual violence. I disliked all of the drug and alcohol and sex talk; Mona was extremely unlikeable and base (masturbating on a plane? "Eating my sushi"? Please, give me a break). It was unsettling how much Mona sexualized violence against women as if it was something to be desired. I understand she was working through her trauma, but I was rolling my eyes the whole time.
If Oloixarac wanted to garner sympathy for South American POC women with this portrayal, she did a terrible job. The only person I felt sympathy for was Sunrita and she was only spoken of in passing. I would've played up "Mona" as a modern da Vinci muse: the lone, impassive figure who is complacent yet observant, always. A blank slate on which to project desire and intention. Tie it all back to what the writers are all doing in Sweden, somehow. I don't know man, I'm not the author! Pero dale, hermana, ponete las pilas.
The tie-in Oloixarac tried to create with the horrific violence Mona endured to that of Sunrita's gang rape and death left much to be desired. Frankly, the entire book was disjointed — likely exacerbated by Mona's liberal vape Valium use — and an unreliable narrator only works if the character is someone who we want to walk with during the story. I just wanted it to be over.
It's trauma, plain and simple, symbolized by final destruction. It could've worked and it didn't. Oh well, on to the next!
Overall: it insists upon itself.
emilenilemil's review against another edition
funny
mysterious
reflective
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
4.0
lupitagonzalez's review against another edition
I read a couple of chapters but I don't think I'm the right audience for this book. The writing didn't draw me in, and I wasn't intrigued by Mona as a character.
quintusmarcus's review
5.0
Screamingly funny book at times, and a brilliant skewering of all the pretentious book award festivals. While she’s at it, the author dumps on other authors, the French, the Left, and everything else irritating, eviscerating them all with gleeful panache. No spoilers here, though, about the shocking ending. I’ll be looking up her other books ASAP.
mcribsy13's review against another edition
adventurous
challenging
dark
emotional
tense
fast-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
4.25
libellus's review against another edition
challenging
dark
emotional
mysterious
reflective
tense
fast-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
4.0
rahmat22818's review against another edition
3.0
up until the end I really enjoyed it and wanted to give it a 4, but the end scene to me didn’t feel like it felt great