Reviews

Space Prison by Tom Godwin

en0jad0's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

This book is from 1958, so I give some credit for pioneering science fiction. There are some innovative ideas and plot shifts.

But this was a tedious read. The characters are thin and repetitive. Seriously, besides names, I couldn't identify a difference between most of them.

I found it interesting how sci-fi has shifted over the years. Kudos to the author for his creativity.

birdmanseven's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

Ohhhhh.... so it's a metaphorical "space prison." Gotcha. Considering that the plot revolves around a society of castoffs who were left behind on a barren planet after their world was taken over and, the original title, "Survivors," makes a whole lot more sense.
Whatever you want to call us, this was a satisfying, pulpy read. I liked it enough to check out the sequel.

leganto's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

This was a fun, pulpy scifi novel about REVENGE. This takes the idea of a "long play" strategy to the extreme! Listen to the audiobook on YouTube; it makes it even more pleasurable!

erin_penn's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

For a long while, after I got old enough to read big words for myself, my mother would pass books she thought were good to me - Robert Heinlein's Podkayne of Mars, for example. Eventually she approved me going into the collection directly and I worked my way through her shelves which included this gem from HER college years - first published in 1958. A book she loved enough to transport from one end of the country to another through at least four different moves.

I loved it too. Massive worldbuilding, MacGyvering, action. I reread it again and again. Now a group of sci-fi classic lovers have uploaded the book for free viewing on Kindle.

Note for the formatting - this is free, the page numbers are included in the text and there are a couple-few transcription issues. The overall result is fine though - especially free for a book which only had a 5,000 first run.

Rereading the book in 2017, the worldbuilding still remains amazing. The ecology of Ragnarok from its climate to its animals is breathtaking. Originally titled "The Survivors", this book makes you feel the hell planet a group of colonists are dumped on by their enemies. The MacGyvering to survive and then thrive remains really cool - gems always have worth.

Downside for 2017 - no female characters of note. The women and children are a background group - dying but essential to survival. Mr. Godwin does show them working along side the men, doing the same sacrifices and more; much more, there are no old child-bearing women. On a 1.5 gravity world where reproduction is as essential as exploration, the explorers will be limited to the men - and those are the ones Mr. Godwin follows. The women stay home and die in childbirth. Not the exciting part of the story for the 1950's readers. The author never demeans women or says they can't do what the men can do, but because they can do something the men cannot do they are not a part of the story.

The story follows the colonists and their descendants for 200 years.

The main lacking in this story is character attachment, you sympathize with the characters but don't empathize. Consider how many people die, not feeling each death personally is a plus. The initial two nights after the colonists arrival on the hell world makes George R.R. Martin's Red Wedding look sedate.

Still a great worldbuilding story even after 60 years; definitely worth the space on your kindle if you like classic sci-fi.

ADDITIONAL NOTE: Eric Flint, in conjunction with Baen Books, has collected many of Tom Godwin's works into "The Cold Equations" (published 2003), including The Survivors/Space Prison and his famous short story "The Cold Equations". While not free, like this particular "Kindle Edition", it's available in paperback so you can have it for your shelves. ... Side amusement, the cover is for "Space Prison" with a person standing holding a crossbow and unicorn goggles (should be black), with a mocker on the shoulder and two prowlers - but, typical of early sci-fi, the person is a scantily garbed woman.

pfracassi's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

Interesting. Not because the story is any good, because it isn't. But the concept, which I'm sure was more of the point, of starting a world from scratch with whatever resources are available was kinda neat. Didn't necessarily work as novel, but an interesting allegory on hope.

criminolly's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

This was pretty great. 158 pages of unexpectedly bleak 1950s SF with a killer ending. Nowadays it would be 1000 pages long and all the worse for it.

jakegalgano14's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark hopeful tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

3.5

lapingveno's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

This was a fun, pulpy scifi novel about REVENGE. This takes the idea of a "long play" strategy to the extreme! Listen to the audiobook on YouTube; it makes it even more pleasurable!

morninglightmountain's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark hopeful medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

4.0

loreleilee's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

4.0

English Review below

Ich habe ein Faible für Vintage Science Fiction, daher kann ich auch diesem Buch viel abgewinnen, auch wenn es viele Fragen offen lässt, streckenweise unlogisch ist und am Ende viel dem Zufall überlässt bzw. darauf baut, dass alles läuft, wie geplant.

Ich will also die Kritik vieler negativer Reviews keineswegs in Frage stellen, es hängt wirklich stark davon ab, was man von einem Buch möchte. 

Schade ist definitiv, dass kein Fokus auf die Bildung neuer Gesellschaftsstrukturen gelegt wurde und die Stellung der Frau sich auch über 200 Jahre nicht verändert. Hier hätte ich mir mehr gewünscht - wenn sich ein Mann in den 50/60ern schon nicht vorstellen kann, dass Frauen mehr können als Kinder kriegen, sollte es wenigstens irgendwie logisch dargestellt werden, warum 50% einer Gesellschaft, die ums Überleben kämpft, kaum dafür herangezogen wird. Es ist definitiv eine Geschichte von einem Mann für Männer und über Männer! 

Trotzdem bleibe ich bei den vier Sternen - ich hatte meinen Spaß!


I have a soft spot for vintage science fiction, so I got a lot out of this book, even if it leaves a lot of questions unanswered, is illogical at times and in the end leaves a lot to chance or relies on everything going as planned.

So I don't want to question the criticism of many negative reviews, it really depends a lot on what you want from a book.

It is definitely a pity that no focus was placed on the formation of new social structures and the position of women has not changed over 200 years. I would have wished for more here - even if a man in the 50s/60s can't imagine that women can do more than have children, it should at least be shown logically in some way why 50% of a society that is struggling to survive is hardly used. It's definitely a story by a man for men and about men!

Nevertheless, I'll stick with the four stars - I had my fun!