Reviews

Wanderlust. Una historia del caminar by Rebecca Solnit

naru11's review against another edition

Go to review page

Unfortunately DNFing this for the moment. She referenced this in some of her more feminist-focused work and I thought it would be similar, but I seem to be unable to get into this. There is so much quoting and paraphrasing of philosophical ideas, that I can't find much interest in right now. This is not a critique of the book itseld (thus, no rating), I went into it with the wrong assumptions. I will keep this on my radar though, and maybe pick ip again.

gonzogrig's review against another edition

Go to review page

funny informative inspiring reflective slow-paced

4.0

This was a pleasant, thoughtful read but not necessarily the kind that lends itself to being read in one go. Though all the chapters follow the common theme of walking, it's explored in such radically different senses that various chapters don't necessarily feel like they're part of the same book. For example, in a stretch of association, Solnit argues that "climbing could be called the art of taking a vertical walk" and therefore devotes an entire chapter to mountaineering (which I didn't particularly care for). As a result, this might be the kind of book best enjoyed in fits and starts; picked up and put down over and over again over weeks or months.

Regardless of how you go about your reading, Solnit is almost guaranteed to surprise you with the rabbit holes of history that she goes down. My personal favorite was her extensive discussion of the manor gardens evolution, from the walled gardens of medieval times to the quintessential English garden in the 18th century. Erudite without getting too dry, this makes for an enjoyable, easy-going read about walking and a wide array of associated activities and landscapes (not only rural, but urban and suburban as well). 

My only compliant is that being published in 2000, Solnit could not foresee the various ways walking has evolved in the last 20 years, from the step-tracking technology, so ubiquitous today, to the annual Slut Walk marches (would have been perfect for her chapter on women in public space) and explosion of political demonstrations in recent years (her chapter on political marches/processions is almost quaintly old fashioned). However, given when it was published, I'm impressed by how intersectional it is. Solnit makes a point of commenting on issues concerning class, race and sexuality, not to mention devoting an entire chapter to women's experience.

susie_and's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

I really enjoyed this but my copy had really small font and it felt slightly too long.. meandering

thopp84's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

A rare misfire from an author that I normally love. I just didn't connect to what she was writing about here, even though I love walking and walk everywhere. But she was way too thorough and dense. It came off as overly pretentious which Solnit is definitely not. A disappointment but I'll still be reading other works by her.

carlyjohelm's review against another edition

Go to review page

informative reflective slow-paced

4.5

apauliner's review against another edition

Go to review page

Premier livre de ma PAL tiré au sort. Je suis bien heureuse de m’être accrochée parce que c’était très intéressant, même si jamais fascinant pour moi qui ne suis pas PASSIONNÉE de marche à pied. Vers la fin les chapitres sur la place des femmes dans la rue et sur Las Vegas m’ont fait penser « je ne regrette pas cette lecture ». Néanmoins malgré l’érudition de l’ouvrage, comme pour certains titres de bell hooks je regrette qu’il nous parvienne en français avec 21 ans de retard. Ça le rend vraiment daté par certains aspects : trop bizarre de lire un livre sur la marche écrit par une penseuse féministe sans que Cheryl Strayed ne soit citée, par exemple.
Globalement une lecture intelligente et facile sur un sujet auquel je ne pensais que peu, un livre qui ne m’a pas renversée mais qui m’a cueillie au bon moment, me permettant de profiter d’une longue promenade dans une ville étrangère avec beaucoup plus de conscience et d’attention. Et n’est-ce pas ce qu’on attend d’un essai, qu’il nous modifie, même rien qu’un peu.

Edit: Ça m’a frappée mais j’ai oublié de le dire avant de lire d’autres reviews, je suis chagrinée également par le point de vue 100% occidentalocentré sur la question. Sûrement l’art de marcher ne peut pas être étudié en mettant de côté la vaste majorité du monde qui ne vit ni en Europe ni en Amérique du Nord.

tiboutoo's review against another edition

Go to review page

2.0

I always finish books, but couldn't finish this one. And it was a Rebecca Solnit book?!?

rickirobin's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

Oh, I wanted to love this so much more than i did. I love the topics the book gives space to, but i found myself skimming more than i wanted to and not absorbing as much as i often do of Solnit's work. Perhaps there was too much name-and-book-dropping to let my mind really wander. Perhaps i'm just less interested in Paris than i should or could be. The last few chapters were the most interesting to me: Vegas and lady-walking.

dkathunt's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

A lovely, if sometimes overly too-philosophical-for-me collection of musings on walking and how it fits into our psyche, culture, and history. Some wonderful observations about the decline of walking and subsequent loss of contemplation and appreciation of time and nature.

hurricanejoe's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

I found Wanderlust: A History of Walking to be very thought-provoking. Rebecca Solnit writes about walking from many different perspectives. She studies how philosophically, walking is connected to how we think and view the world, and how journeys help to transform our perspectives. I found her analysis of walking as a political act and target as one of the most interesting. She considers topics ranging from protesting, to falsely arguing women inferiority to men, to the corporate control of walking spaces. She also discusses the negative repercussions from lifestyles that fail to include walking - how our migration from the cities to the suburbs has left us lonely and without much recourse than to waste away our time in front of the television. All things that resonated with me on many different levels.

The only negative about this book is that at times it feels targeted towards more academic minds and drones on with imagery that I found dull and ultimately did not offer much in the way of the topic of walking. With my second attempt, I was able to finish it before I needed to return it to the library. While I only gave it four stars for that reason, I am absolutely grateful that I took the time out to take in this book.