You need to sign in or sign up before continuing.
Scan barcode
whatanovelworld's review against another edition
5.0
Everyone should read it, and if it makes you angry because you don't think it could possibly be true... Read it again... And ask why you're so angry.
stacyverb's review against another edition
4.0
Even if you've read some or all of the eight Atlantic essays before, this book is worth reading for the new material alone. Coates' writing is impassioned and insightful as always.
smcgillicuddy320's review against another edition
5.0
This book is essential reading. It gave me clarity on the current state of American politics. I was definitely aware of the undercurrent of racism that carried Trump to an electoral victory in 2016, but this book makes it plain that we all have a responsibility to talk about it. We can't ignore it. We can't dance around the issue. We can't let Democrats rely on a strategy of appealing to "white working class voters."
Instead, we should be talking about why it's wrong to surrender to racist ideas. When someone talks about how liberals are "anti-white" and "whites founded the USA," etc., ask that person questions like this:
"Is there anything besides your whiteness that you are proud of?"
"Are there things in this world that you care about more than being white?"
"Now separate those values from race. Think about these things that you care about and why they are important to you. Will a vote for a politician who promises to punish "immigrants, Muslims, blacks, or gay people" address those things that are important to you and award you for those qualities that are more important to you than being white?"
These line of questioning might seem naive. Perhaps it is. But this country needs to talk about racism and how it infects our politics. Today politicians are using racism to seize power, and then they use that power to enrich themselves and the rich people who fund them, while nearly all voters are screwed over. It needs to end.
Instead, we should be talking about why it's wrong to surrender to racist ideas. When someone talks about how liberals are "anti-white" and "whites founded the USA," etc., ask that person questions like this:
"Is there anything besides your whiteness that you are proud of?"
"Are there things in this world that you care about more than being white?"
"Now separate those values from race. Think about these things that you care about and why they are important to you. Will a vote for a politician who promises to punish "immigrants, Muslims, blacks, or gay people" address those things that are important to you and award you for those qualities that are more important to you than being white?"
These line of questioning might seem naive. Perhaps it is. But this country needs to talk about racism and how it infects our politics. Today politicians are using racism to seize power, and then they use that power to enrich themselves and the rich people who fund them, while nearly all voters are screwed over. It needs to end.
derekcaelin's review against another edition
5.0
In many ways "We Were Eight Years In Power" has been a fitting capstone to the year. Two of Coates' essays delved into subjects I had read about this year: Malcolm X and Michelle Obama. To have these people reviewed through another perspective - especially a perspective as intellectually rigourous as Coates - deepened my understanding of both. The other essays in this collection were likewise thought provoking. I had, to some extent, been aware of the way the U.S. structurely disadvantages people of color and black people in specific. The author hammered home the details of this system, and does so with poignancy, that fleshed out my understanding of history and deepened my anger. A couple takeaways:
* One of the potential flaws of liberalism is the assumption that taking a color-blind approach to policy will result in a colorblind impact. However, Coates provides ample detail on how policies that we think of as the hallmarks of liberal efforts - the New Deal, the GI Bill and the federal subsidization of suburban housing - were explicitly designed or allowed to come into being only if they excluded blacks from benefiting. Because of this, any government policy that impacts justice, health care, or wealth should explicitly consider race as it is formulized, if only to address the impact of a deepening racial divide.
* The argument for reparations to America's black population is not one that I had dedicated significant thought to. It seemed to me that, as Obama and other actors have argued, if the black population was disproportionately impoverished as a result of policies, then policies geared towards addressing poverty at large should be able to lift up blacks as well as whites and other ethnic groups. However, the argument Coates makes here, that the poverty and economic disadvantages faced by blacks is unique, since in many ways it is the product of decades of design, and that it does not emerge from the same structural disadvantage that results in poverty in whites, suggests that a fully color blind approach is not a viable way to address black poverty. There is a danger of suggesting that the roots of white poverty are the roots of all poverty in the U.S., and ignoring the role of the criminal justice system, education system, health care systems, etc, in perpetuating the wealth gap in black america. Therefore, solutions to poverty *should* consider race and all the elements of justice, health care, education, climate, etc.
This underlines the arguments I'm hearing from people like Rihanna Gunn-Wright. Holisitic approaches are more complicated, but essential if we want to achieve justice.
This book angered me, saddened me, and made me ashamed of the ways I, and the people I support, say things and make decisions that perpetuate inequality. I hope that reading it is helping to deepen my understanding and make me into a better person.
* One of the potential flaws of liberalism is the assumption that taking a color-blind approach to policy will result in a colorblind impact. However, Coates provides ample detail on how policies that we think of as the hallmarks of liberal efforts - the New Deal, the GI Bill and the federal subsidization of suburban housing - were explicitly designed or allowed to come into being only if they excluded blacks from benefiting. Because of this, any government policy that impacts justice, health care, or wealth should explicitly consider race as it is formulized, if only to address the impact of a deepening racial divide.
* The argument for reparations to America's black population is not one that I had dedicated significant thought to. It seemed to me that, as Obama and other actors have argued, if the black population was disproportionately impoverished as a result of policies, then policies geared towards addressing poverty at large should be able to lift up blacks as well as whites and other ethnic groups. However, the argument Coates makes here, that the poverty and economic disadvantages faced by blacks is unique, since in many ways it is the product of decades of design, and that it does not emerge from the same structural disadvantage that results in poverty in whites, suggests that a fully color blind approach is not a viable way to address black poverty. There is a danger of suggesting that the roots of white poverty are the roots of all poverty in the U.S., and ignoring the role of the criminal justice system, education system, health care systems, etc, in perpetuating the wealth gap in black america. Therefore, solutions to poverty *should* consider race and all the elements of justice, health care, education, climate, etc.
This underlines the arguments I'm hearing from people like Rihanna Gunn-Wright. Holisitic approaches are more complicated, but essential if we want to achieve justice.
This book angered me, saddened me, and made me ashamed of the ways I, and the people I support, say things and make decisions that perpetuate inequality. I hope that reading it is helping to deepen my understanding and make me into a better person.
meg_kenobi's review against another edition
5.0
This is the third book I've read (this one being a collection of essays written during the Obama administration) by Ta-Nehisi Coates, and the third five star rating I've given him. He is a phenomenal writer, unlike almost any other I've read in my 30 years on this earth. His essays, and the writing preceding them, were insightful, compelling, gorgeously written, and overall, important to the conversations we have about race in our society. They force you to think, to consider and possibly reconsider your views, and most importantly challenge the way you think.