Reviews

Il Mercante di Venezia by William Shakespeare

sgrobler's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

read it for school.

s_piotrowicz's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

Uh . . . how exactly am I supposed to rate Shakespeare on Goodreads, of all places? Five stars for the excellent poetry; one star deducted for the rampant anti-Semitism?

We read this play for our local book club, and I realized that my eccentric upbringing as a homeschooler, who read almost exclusively older literature in high school, aids me in understanding Shakespeare. It really is like a different language, but one that feels vaguely familiar to me. For those members of our book club who could not relate to the old language, reading the play was not an enjoyable experience.

One member did have a good suggestion: to read the plot summary first and then watch the play (or a movie of the play) without needing to worry about the meaning of each word.

I had never read the Merchant of Venice before, and I went into the story blind. But I really enjoyed it. You have Antonio, a Venetian merchant, who basically has a diversified stock portfolio, and has tied up all his capital in shipping ventures. Then you have Bassanio, who needs cash to look the part when he woos the beautiful Portia, and needs a loan from his friend, Antonio. ("Friend" feels weak. This is more like an Anne of Green Gables type "bosom friend." :-P) Antonio has no ready cash but tells Bassanio he can use Antonio's credit to obtain a loan from the wealthy Jew, Shylock. Shylock has plenty of valid reasons for hating Antonio's guts (like, I don't know, he SPIT on him???), but, perhaps most importantly, Antonio threatens Shylock's business, because he loans out money without interest, unlike Shylock.

So Shylock proposes an unusual contract: he will loan Bassanio the money on Antonio's credit, but if Antonio defaults on the loan, he will take a literal pound of Antonio's flesh. That sets up the main action of the plot.

Meanwhile, Bassanio goes to woo fair Portia, who is bound to pick a suitor based on a ridiculous test fashioned by her dead father: each suitor must select a box--either gold, silver, and lead--and if they open the right box, with a picture of Portia inside, then they will be able to marry her.

I could go on and on, but to me the three most fascinating topics were the following: 1) the friendship between Antonio and Bassanio; 2) the way the women in the story have little independence and are forced to resort to extremely creative measures to gain any power; 3) the over-the-top anti-Semitism, illustrating the attitudes of the time, where a Jew could only be good if they would convert to Christianity (remind anyone of, I don't know, the INQUISITION??).

Overall, I am so glad I read this book, if only to read famous lines like "Love is blind" and to experience that feeling of awe when I realized, "Oh, THIS is where that comes from!" Shakespeare, while inaccessible to most, is still influencing modern culture. What a bad-ass! :-P

leslie115's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

I've read this play a number of times, and the introduction by Daniel Pollack-Pelzner for the Shakespeare 2020 project offers some interesting insights into the character of Shylock (e.g., I didn't know the name is familiar to the British). Thanks to Emma Smith, I also have to think more about the intriguing love triangle between Portia, Bassanio, and Antonio (AKA, the merchant of Venice).

flyingspy's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark reflective fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes

3.5

superwritermom's review against another edition

Go to review page

Huh. I don't remember reading this. Maybe in college. Maybe I should reread since I only gave it three stars? I mainly remember this as being the source of "pound of flesh."

thelanabear's review against another edition

Go to review page

1.0

Well, that aged badly.

sydneydorais's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

Read Again: Maybe
Content: 5/5
Romance: 3/5
Sadness: 1/5
Funny: 2/5
Ending: 3/5
Favorite Character: Antonio
Favorite Quote: "But love is blind, and lovers cannot see The pretty follies that themselves commit."- Jessica

ddup2's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

1.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

maria_pulver's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark sad medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

3.0

I've read this play first when I was a teen and honestly though I have already experienced antisemitism at that time, I don't remember recognizing the play as such. In June 2023 I've attended a lecture by Dr. Emmy Leah Zitter on how she teaches this play in a Jewish college to students that often come from families of Holocaust survivors and yesterday I've read a chapter on it in People Love Dead Jews: Reports from a Haunted Present, where Dara Horn argues that the play is antisemitic, though the majority of modern critics believe differently. 
Therefore I've decided it's time to re-read the play and decide for myself - is it a question of nuanced reading or is it another example of antisemitism. To be blatantly clear: this is awful, disgusting and totally Jew-hating play. There are no sympathetic characters in the play - all are indecent and immoral from my point of view, Shylock included. But while all the other characters are justified, redeemed and get to have their happily ever after, Shylock the Jew is being punished before, during and after the events of the play. First, he gets to live the life of the hated other - being spit at, called a dog and etc. Then he is required to lend money at low profit to someone who refuses to treat him as a human being and still he's being criticized for doing it - regardless the fact that there was no other business allowed for the Jews to take part in. A moment later his daughter Jessica betrays him running away with a Christian and taking his money and valuables with her. She betrays him, but more - she betrays G-d and her people with this choice and it is very difficult to bear. At last, Shylock gets his chance at court, but there his punishment is complete - all of his hard earned money is taken from him and he is forced to give up his religion, which is obviously central for him. Yes, Shylock is not a good person, full of hatred and looking for vedgence. He's similar enough to Marvel's villains in this attitude, but this is not a reasonable justification for either the hateful behaviour towards him at the beginning of the play or the forced conversion from his religion at the end of it. 

unpaintedsloppy's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

Portia and Nerissa are lesbians