Scan barcode
bookish_kristina's review
DNF! In the first chapter the words ‘hunk’, ‘buns’, ‘stud’ and ‘scrumptious’ were used to describe the male lead… I can’t. I’m out!
This is the last time I let my husband talk me into audiobook russian roulette!
Update: I wasn’t going to rate this because I thought it must be written in 1985, but since it’s written in 2017, I’m one starring this with no regrets.
Updated update: it was originally released in 1996, but updated and rereleased in 2017, because the update included the words above, the rating stands….NOPE!
This is the last time I let my husband talk me into audiobook russian roulette!
Update: I wasn’t going to rate this because I thought it must be written in 1985, but since it’s written in 2017, I’m one starring this with no regrets.
Updated update: it was originally released in 1996, but updated and rereleased in 2017, because the update included the words above, the rating stands….NOPE!
shawna_jo's review
3.0
Here is the thing, I really liked the premise of this book. It had such great potential but SPOILER it does a big bait and switch on you!
Spoiler
I don't read books that involve pregnancy, babies, kids, etc. They are just kinda icky to me and aren't my thing. And that ended up being a pretty big deal in this book. It started out great and could have ended great if it wasn't for the whole baby thing...imii38's review
emotional
funny
fast-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
ingypingy2000's review against another edition
2.0
Could have been cute, could have been sweet.. I just found the heroine to be utterly cold and I couldn't relate to her at all.