Reviews

Jedna ruža sama by Muriel Barbery, Olja Petronić

katie_is_dreaming's review against another edition

Go to review page

Rating: 9/10

Something about Muriel Barbery’s writing, even in translation, is just so rich for me that it’s just a pleasure to read.

This is a short book, but it’s one that it’s worth taking time to savour. Barbery’s ideas can feel fleeting, or obscure, which I think some readers might find frustrating. I do acknowledge that her work isn’t exactly accessible. I think that’s what I like about it! It’s philosophical in tone, and when I say the ideas feel fleeting, I mean that there’s a way to read her at a surface level that might make the story feel mediocre, or not very well developed, but if you sit with her words a while, you almost taste them, and, gradually, you get the deeper messages of what she’s saying, the subtler flavours, if you will.

I know I’m talking about language as if it were food, but that’s what reading Barbery feels like, in a way. That’s why I refer to it as rich. And I think the food reference is particularly apt for this book, which is about senses, in a way: the senses of taste and smell and sight, as Rose explores Kyoto at her late father’s request, but also the sense of the self.

I really liked the description of Rose early in the book, how she hasn’t truly been living, how she hasn’t given herself up to anything. In Japan, however, all of that changes, as she allows herself to feel things as she explores beautiful temples and samples Japanese food and drink. The descriptions here are gorgeous, and make me really want to visit Japan. It’s clear Barbery really loves the country.

I also really enjoyed Rose’s journey and her relationship with Paul. The descriptions of Rose are alluring, and I could really picture her and her life before. There’s something about all the imagery in this book that’s so transfixing. The flowers, and the rain, and the maple, and the moss… I just think it’s beautiful.

I do think there’s repetition here, in terms of Rose’s journey. There’s a series of fits and starts in her opening up. While that feels kind of circular, it also feels realistic. I know some will feel like nothing happens, or like the journey she goes on feels nebulous or unsatisfying, but I do think there’s a certain brave refusal on Barbery’s part to wrap everything up neatly. She doesn’t satisfy the reader completely. Other readers might find that frustrating, or the story pointless as a result, but I enjoyed the glimpses of depth, and appreciated the depiction of difficult emotions being impossible to really explain that Barbery gives us here. How do you explain grief for a father you never knew? How is that even logical? So, Barbery choses not to close out Rose’s journey in a neat way.

This definitely isn’t as accessible a read as The Elegance of the Hedgehog, but it is more accessible than The Life of Elves. It won’t be for everyone. I think Barbery is an acquired taste anyway. I just happen to really appreciate how she writes and what she says. I didn’t love this like I loved Hedgehog, but I think this is, in some ways, a more memorable, and certainly more haunting, book, and I’m so glad I chose this to start my 2022 reading year with. I like to start each year with a really great book, and this certainly was that. It may even make my list of favourites for 2022. We shall see!

Blog: awonderfulbook.com | Instagram: katiemotenbooks | Twitter: katiemotenbooks

kimchinquee's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

Another beauty by Barbery. Loved the language, the botany details, and Rose. The connections and losses. Gorgeous book.

mpe808's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

A very quick read and a very beautiful love story from father to daughter and from daughter to (spoiler refrain). I have always wanted to visit Japan and this story reminded me why. Simplicity at its best creates a sense of deep reflection and growth. Loved the book!

jcoakley's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

I found myself putting this book down after a paragraph or two at first, somewhat frustrated with the abstract, almost Proustian style of the prose. But then, once I'd dedicated a morning to it (it's not long), I decided it's quite lovely.

indiarose8's review against another edition

Go to review page

emotional reflective sad slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.0

I felt like nothing really happened, it was told in a very abstract, surreal, experimental way. I didn’t get to know the characters at all. The descriptions of Japan were lovely. 

moonchildimane's review against another edition

Go to review page

inspiring lighthearted medium-paced

3.0

breadandmushrooms's review against another edition

Go to review page

emotional reflective sad slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

4.5

camitumbi's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark emotional hopeful inspiring reflective sad fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

4.0

killedshini's review against another edition

Go to review page

2.0

Love, death, Japan, and Buddhism, all experienced by an alienated (and now filthy rich) French botanist over the twelve chapters that symbolized the course of the year. While I did enjoy the overall vibe and some specific garden descriptions, many stylistic elements felt forced. Also, It can be fun to have intros for each chapter to determine the way the chapter develops, but it shouldn't be so on the nose - I mean, it is a book about Japan, after all, we can handle some subtlety!

cloereadsbooks's review against another edition

Go to review page

reflective slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

2.0